4 What
are the typical steps in getting and maintaining a standard patent?
The following diagram shows most of the
typical steps involved in getting and maintaining a standard patent. The
diagram is intended for use only as a general introductory illustration and is
not intended to have any other effect. If there is an inconsistency between any
matter contained in the diagram and a provision of this Act or the regulations,
the provision prevails.
TABLE
1—GETTING AND MAINTAINING A STANDARD PATENT
Patent
application
(provisional or complete)
(see section 29)
|
|
Publication
of prescribed
details in Official Journal
|
|
Subject-matter
of
complete specification
classified using International
Patent Classification
|
|
Abstracts
prepared for
search material
|
|
Pay
continuation fees
for unaccepted
patent requests
|
|
Direction
to request
examination unless
applicant has already
done so (see section 44)
|
|
Examination
(see section 45)
|
|













Continuation
fees are
prescribed and payable under
the regulations.
Applications lapse
if
continuation fees are not paid
(see section 142).
|
|
Application
lapses if patent
request and complete
specification not accepted
within the prescribed period
(see section 142).
|
|
Applicant must
request
examination as directed or
application will lapse (see
section 142).
|
|
Applicant may
be required to
correct deficiencies. Application
will lapse if applicant does not
comply.
|
|
Fee payable.
A complete
application must be
associated with a provisional
application within the
prescribed period.
Provisionals
which lapse at this
stage are not published.
|
|










5 Associated applications
For the purposes of this Act, a complete
application is to be taken to be associated with a provisional application if,
and only if, the patent request filed in respect of the complete application
identifies the provisional application and contains a statement to the effect
that the applications are associated.
[Note: see sections 29 and 38]
6
Deposit requirements
For the purposes of this Act, the
deposit requirements are to be taken to be satisfied in relation to a micro‑organism
to which a specification relates if, and only if:
(a) the micro‑organism was, on or
before the date of filing of the specification, deposited with a prescribed
depositary institution in accordance with the rules relating to micro‑organisms;
and
(b) the specification includes, at
that date, such relevant information on the characteristics of the micro‑organism
as is known to the applicant; and
(c) at all times since the end of the
prescribed period, the specification has included:
(i) the name of a
prescribed depositary institution from which samples of the micro‑organism are
obtainable as provided by the rules relating to micro‑organisms; and
(iii) the file, accession or
registration number of the deposit given by the institution; and
(d) at all times since the date of
filing of the specification, samples of the micro‑organism have been obtainable
from a prescribed depositary institution as provided by those rules.
[Note: see sections 41 and 42]
7
Novelty and inventive step
Novelty
(1) For the purposes of this Act, an
invention is to be taken to be novel when compared with the prior art base
unless it is not novel in the light of any one of the following kinds of
information, each of which must be considered separately:
(a) prior art information (other than
that mentioned in paragraph (c)) made publicly available in a single
document or through doing a single act;
(b) prior art information (other than
that mentioned in paragraph (c)) made publicly available in 2 or more
related documents, or through doing 2 or more related acts, if the relationship
between the documents or acts is such that a person skilled in the relevant art
would treat them as a single source of that information;
(c) prior art information contained in
a single specification of the kind mentioned in subparagraph (b)(ii) of
the definition of prior art base in Schedule 1.
Inventive step
(2) For the purposes of this Act, an
invention is to be taken to involve an inventive step when compared with the
prior art base unless the invention would have been obvious to a person skilled
in the relevant art in the light of the common general knowledge as it existed
in the patent area before the priority date of the relevant claim, whether that
knowledge is considered separately or together with the information mentioned
in subsection (3).
(3) The information for the purposes of subsection (2)
is:
(a) any single piece of prior art
information; or
(b) a combination of any 2 or more
pieces of prior art information;
being information that the skilled person mentioned in subsection (2)
could, before the priority date of the relevant claim, be reasonably expected
to have ascertained, understood, regarded as relevant and, in the case of
information mentioned in paragraph (b), combined as mentioned in that
paragraph.
Innovative step
(4) For the purposes of this Act, an
invention is to be taken to involve an innovative step when compared with the
prior art base unless the invention would, to a person skilled in the
relevant art, in the light of the common general knowledge as it existed
in the patent area before the priority date of the relevant claim, only vary
from the kinds of information set out in subsection (5) in ways that make no
substantial contribution to the working of the invention.
(5) For the purposes of subsection (4),
the information is of the following kinds:
(a) prior art information made
publicly available in a single document or through doing a single act;
(b) prior art information made
publicly available in 2 or more related documents, or through doing 2 or more
related acts, if the relationship between the documents or acts is such that a
person skilled in the relevant art would treat them as a single source of that
information.
(6) For the purposes of subsection (4),
each kind of information set out in subsection (5) must be considered
separately.
[Notes: (1) For
the meaning of document see section 2B of the Acts Interpretation Act
1901.
(2) See
also the definitions of prior art base and prior art information
in Schedule 1: see also paragraph 18(1)(b) and subsection 98(1).]
8
Disclosure in basic applications
Subject to the regulations, account must
not be taken, for the purposes of this Act, of a disclosure in a specification
or other document filed in respect of, and at the same time as, a basic
application unless the following documents are filed within the prescribed
period:
(a) a copy of the specification or
document;
(b) if the specification or document is
not in English—a translation of the specification or document into English.
[Note: basic application is
defined in Schedule 1: see also Part 2 of Chapter 8.]
9
Secret use
For the purposes of this Act, the
following acts are not to be taken to be secret use of an invention in the
patent area:
(a) any use of the invention by or on
behalf of, or with the authority of, the patentee or nominated person, or his
or her predecessor in title to the invention, for the purpose of reasonable
trial or experiment only;
(b) any use of the invention by or on
behalf of, or with the authority of, the patentee or nominated person, or his
or her predecessor in title to the invention, being use occurring solely in the
course of a confidential disclosure of the invention by or on behalf of, or
with the authority of, the patentee, nominated person, or predecessor in title;
(c) any other use of the invention by
or on behalf of, or with the authority of, the patentee or nominated person, or
his or her predecessor in title to the invention, for any purpose other than
the purpose of trade or commerce;
(d) any use of the invention by or on
behalf of the Commonwealth, a State, or a Territory where the patentee or
nominated person, or his or her predecessor in title to the invention, has
disclosed the invention, so far as claimed, to the Commonwealth, State or
Territory.
[Note: See also paragraph 18(1)(d)]
10
Certain international applications to be taken to have been given an
international filing date
(1) Where:
(a) an international application
specifies Australia as a designated State under Article 4(1)(ii) of the PCT;
and
(b) the receiving Office does not give
the application an international filing date; and
(c) the
Commissioner is satisfied that the application should, under Article 25(2)(a)
of the PCT, be treated as if it had been given an international filing date;
the application is to be taken, for the purposes of this
Act, to have been given an international filing date under Article 11 of the
PCT.
(2) This section does not apply to an
international application that was not filed in the receiving Office in English
unless a translation of the application into English, verified in accordance
with the regulations, has been filed.
(3) Where this section applies, the international
filing date of the application is to be taken to be the date that, in the
opinion of the Commissioner, should have been given to the application as its
international filing date under the PCT.
[Note: international filing date
is defined in Schedule 1: see also Chapter 8.]
11 Act
binds the Crown
(1) This Act binds the Crown in right of the
Commonwealth, of each of the States, of the Australian Capital Territory, of
the Northern Territory and of Norfolk Island.
(2) Nothing in this Act makes the Crown
liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
12
Application of Act
This Act extends to:
(a) each
external Territory; and
(b) the
Australian continental shelf; and
(c) the
waters above the Australian continental shelf; and
(d) the airspace above Australia, each external Territory and the Australian continental shelf.
12A
Application of the Criminal Code
Chapter 2
of the Criminal Code applies to all offences created by this Act.
Note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code
sets out the general principles of criminal responsibility.
Chapter 2—Patent rights, ownership and validity
Part 1—Patent rights
13
Exclusive rights given by patent
(1) Subject to this Act, a patent gives the
patentee the exclusive rights, during the term of the patent, to exploit the
invention and to authorise another person to exploit the invention.
(2) The exclusive rights are personal
property and are capable of assignment and of devolution by law.
(3) A patent has effect throughout the patent
area.
14
Assignment of patent
(1) An assignment of a patent must be in
writing signed by or on behalf of the assignor and assignee.
(2) A patent may be assigned for a place in,
or part of, the patent area.
Part 2—Ownership
15 Who
may be granted a patent?
(1) Subject to this Act, a patent for an
invention may only be granted to a person who:
(a) is the inventor; or
(b) would, on the grant of a patent
for the invention, be entitled to have the patent assigned to the person; or
(c) derives title to the invention
from the inventor or a person mentioned in paragraph (b); or
(d) is the legal representative of a
deceased person mentioned in paragraph (a), (b) or (c).
(2) A patent may be granted to a person
whether or not he or she is an Australian citizen.
16 Co‑ownership
of patents
(1) Subject to any agreement to the contrary,
where there are 2 or more patentees:
(a) each of them is entitled to an
equal undivided share in the patent; and
(b) each of them is entitled to
exercise the exclusive rights given by the patent for his or her own benefit
without accounting to the others; and
(c) none of them can grant a licence
under the patent, or assign an interest in it, without the consent of the
others.
(2) Where a patented product, or a product of
a patented method or process, is sold by any of 2 or more patentees, the buyer,
and a person claiming through the buyer, may deal with the product as if it had
been sold by all the patentees.
(3) This section does not affect the rights
or obligations of a trustee or of the legal representative of a deceased
person, or rights or obligations arising out of either of those relationships.
17
Directions to co‑owners
(1) Where there are 2 or more patentees, the
Commissioner may, on the application of any of them, give such directions in
accordance with the application as the Commissioner thinks fit, being
directions about:
(a) a dealing with the patent or an
interest in it; or
(b) the grant of licences under the
patent; or
(c) the exercise of a right under
section 16 in relation to the patent.
(2) If a patentee fails to do anything
necessary to carry out a direction under subsection (1) within 14 days
after being asked in writing to do so by one of the other patentees, the
Commissioner may, on the application of one of those other patentees, direct a
person to do it in the name and on behalf of the defaulting patentee.
(3) Before giving a direction, the
Commissioner must give an opportunity to be heard:
(a) in the case of an application by a
patentee or patentees under subsection (1)—to the other patentee or
patentees; and
(b) in the case of an application
under subsection (2)—to the defaulting patentee.
(4) The Commissioner must not give a
direction that:
(a) affects the rights or obligations
of a trustee or of the legal representative of a deceased person, or rights or
obligations arising out of either of those relationships; or
(b) is inconsistent with the terms of
an agreement between the patentees.
Part 3—Validity
Division 1—Validity
18
Patentable inventions
Patentable inventions for the purposes of a standard
patent
(1) Subject to subsection (2), an
invention is a patentable invention for the purposes of a standard patent if
the invention, so far as claimed in any claim:
(a) is a manner of manufacture within
the meaning of section 6 of the Statute of Monopolies; and
(b) when compared with the prior art
base as it existed before the priority date of that claim:
(i) is novel; and
(ii) involves an inventive
step; and
(c) is useful; and
(d) was not secretly used in the
patent area before the priority date of that claim by, or on behalf of, or with
the authority of, the patentee or nominated person or the patentee’s or
nominated person’s predecessor in title to the invention.
Patentable inventions for the purposes of an innovation
patent
(1A) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), an
invention is a patentable invention for the purposes of an innovation patent if
the invention, so far as claimed in any claim:
(a) is a manner of manufacture within
the meaning of section 6 of the Statute of Monopolies; and
(b) when compared with the prior art
base as it existed before the priority date of that claim:
(i) is novel; and
(ii) involves an innovative
step; and
(c) is useful; and
(d) was not secretly used in the
patent area before the priority date of that claim by, or on behalf of, or with
the authority of, the patentee or nominated person or the patentee’s or
nominated person’s predecessor in title to the invention.
(2) Human beings, and the biological
processes for their generation, are not patentable inventions.
Certain inventions not patentable inventions for the
purposes of an innovation patent
(3) For the purposes of an innovation patent,
plants and animals, and the biological processes for the generation of plants
and animals, are not patentable inventions.
(4) Subsection (3) does not apply if the
invention is a microbiological process or a product of such a process.
[Note: see also sections 7 and
9.]
19
Certificate of validity
(1) In any proceedings in a court in which
the validity of a patent, or of a claim, is disputed, the court may certify
that the validity of a specified claim was questioned.
(2) If a court issues a certificate, then, in
any subsequent proceedings for infringement of the claim concerned, or for the
revocation of the patent so far as it relates to that claim, the patentee, or
any other person supporting the validity of the claim is, on obtaining a final
order or judgment in his or her favour, entitled to full costs, charges and
expenses as between solicitor and client, so far as that claim is concerned.
(3) Subsection (2) has effect subject to
any direction by the court trying the proceedings.
20
Validity of patent not guaranteed
(1) Nothing done under this Act or the PCT
guarantees the granting of a patent, or that a patent is valid, in Australia or anywhere else.
(2) The
Commonwealth, the Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner, or an employee, is not
liable because of, or in connection with, doing any act under this Act or the
PCT, or any proceedings consequent on doing any such act.
21
Validity not implied by making or refusal of non‑infringement declaration
The making of, or refusal to make, a non‑infringement
declaration in respect of a claim of a patent does not imply that the claim is
valid.
Division 2—Matters not affecting validity
22
Invalidity in relation to one claim not to affect validity in relation to other
claims
The invalidity of a patent in relation
to a claim does not affect its validity in relation to any other claim.
23
Validity not affected by publication etc. after priority date
A patent is not invalid, so far as the
invention is claimed in any claim, merely because of:
(a) the publication or use of the
invention, so far as claimed in that claim, on or after the priority date of
that claim; or
(b) the grant of another patent which
claims the invention, so far as claimed in the first‑mentioned claim, in a
claim of the same or a later priority date.
24
Validity not affected by certain publication or use
(1) For the purpose of deciding whether an
invention is novel or involves an inventive step or an innovative step, the
person making the decision must disregard:
(a) any information made publicly
available, through any publication or use of the invention in the prescribed
circumstances, by or with the consent of the nominated person or patentee, or
the predecessor in title of the nominated person or patentee; and
(b) any
information made publicly available without the consent of the nominated person
or patentee, through any publication or use of the invention by another person
who derived the information from the nominated person or patentee or from the
predecessor in title of the nominated person or patentee;
but only if a patent application for the invention is made
within the prescribed period.
(2) For the
purpose of deciding whether an invention is novel or involves an inventive step
or an innovative step, the person making the decision must disregard:
(a) any information given by, or with
the consent of, the nominated person or the patentee, or his or her predecessor
in title, to any of the following, but to no other person or organisation:
(i) the Commonwealth or a
State or Territory, or an authority of the Commonwealth or a State or
Territory;
(ii) a person authorised by
the Commonwealth or a State or Territory to investigate the invention; and
(b) anything done for the purpose of
an investigation mentioned in subparagraph (a)(ii).
25
Validity: patents of addition
Objection cannot be taken to a patent
request or complete specification in respect of an application for a patent of
addition, and a patent of addition is not invalid, merely because the
invention, so far as claimed, does not involve an inventive step, having regard
to the publication or use of the main invention during the prescribed period.
26
Validity not affected in certain cases involving amendments
(1) Objection cannot be taken to a patent
request and specification that have been accepted, and a patent is not invalid,
merely because the specification claims an invention that was not the subject
of the request, or that was not described or claimed in the specification as
filed.
(2) Except in the case of an amendment made
in contravention of section 112, objection cannot be taken to a patent
request and specification that have been accepted, and a patent is not invalid,
merely because an amendment of the specification has been made that was not
allowable.
Division 3—Notice of matters affecting validity
27
Notice of matters affecting validity of standard patents
(1) A person may, within the prescribed
period after a complete specification filed in relation to an application for a
standard patent becomes open to public inspection, notify the Commissioner, in
accordance with the regulations, that the person asserts, for reasons stated in
the notice, that the invention concerned is not a patentable invention because
it does not comply with paragraph 18(1)(b).
(2) The Commissioner must inform the
applicant for the patent in writing of any matter of which the Commissioner is
notified and send the applicant a copy of any document accompanying the notice.
(3) The Commissioner must otherwise consider
and deal with a notice in accordance with the regulations.
(4) A notice and any document accompanying it
are open to public inspection.
28
Notice of matters affecting validity of innovation patents
Person may give notice of invalidity of an innovation
patent
(1) A person may notify the Commissioner that
the person asserts, for reasons stated in the notice, that an innovation patent
is invalid because the invention concerned does not comply with paragraph
18(1A)(b).
When notice may be given
(2) A notice may only be given to the
Commissioner under subsection (1) in respect of an innovation patent
within the prescribed period after an innovation patent has been granted.
How notice must be given
(3) Notice must be given in accordance with
the regulations.
Commissioner must inform patentee of notice given
(4) If the Commissioner receives a notice in
respect of an innovation patent, the Commissioner must inform the patentee, in
writing, of any matter of which the Commissioner is notified and send the
patentee a copy of any document accompanying the notice.
Commissioner to deal with notice in accordance with
regulations
(5) The Commissioner must otherwise consider
and deal with a notice in accordance with the regulations.
Chapter 3—From application to acceptance
Part 1—Patent applications
Division 1—Applications
29
Application for patent
(1) A person may apply for a patent for an
invention by filing, in accordance with the regulations, a patent request and
such other documents as are prescribed.
(2) An application may be a provisional
application or a complete application.
(3) A patent request in relation to a provisional
application must be in the approved form and accompanied by a provisional
specification.
(4) A patent request in relation to a
complete application must be in the approved form and accompanied by a complete
specification.
(5) In this section:
person includes a body of persons, whether
incorporated or not.
[Note: see also section 5 for
requirements relating to associated applications.]
30
Filing date
A patent application is to be taken to
have been made on the filing date determined under the regulations.
31
Joint applicants
2 or more persons (within the meaning of
section 29) may make a joint patent application.
32
Disputes between applicants etc.
If a dispute arises between any 2 or
more interested parties in relation to a patent application whether, or in what
manner, the application should proceed, the Commissioner may, on a request made
in accordance with the regulations by any of those parties, make any
determinations the Commissioner thinks fit for enabling the application to
proceed in the name of one or more of the parties alone, or for regulating the
manner in which it is to proceed, or both, as the case requires.
33
Applications by opponents etc.
Opposition to standard patent if a person other than
nominated person eligible for grant of patent
(1) If:
(a) an application has been made for a
standard patent; and
(b) the grant of the standard patent
is opposed under section 59 by one or more persons; and
(c) the Commissioner decides, under
section 60, that:
(i) one or more opponents
are eligible persons in relation to the invention, so far as claimed in any
claim of the opposed patent application (the original claim); and
(ii) the nominated person
in respect of the application is not an eligible person in relation to the
invention; and
(iii) there is no other
reason that a patent should not be granted; and
(d) a complete application is made
under section 29 by one or more of the eligible persons for a patent in
relation to the invention;
the Commissioner may grant those eligible persons a patent
jointly for the invention, so far as so claimed.
Opposition to standard patent if nominated person
eligible for grant of patent with other persons
(2) If:
(a) an application has been made for a
standard patent; and
(b) the grant of the patent is opposed
under section 59 by one or more persons; and
(c) the Commissioner decides, under
section 60:
(i) that both the
nominated person and one or more of the opponents are eligible persons in
relation to the invention, so far as claimed in any claim of the opposed patent
application (the original claim); and
(ii) that there is no other
reason that a patent should not be granted; and
(d) a complete application is made by
one or more of the eligible persons under section 29 for a patent in relation
to the invention;
the Commissioner may grant a patent for the invention, so
far as so claimed, to those eligible persons jointly.
Opposition to innovation patent if patentee not
entitled to grant of patent but another person is
(3) If:
(a) an innovation patent is opposed
under section 101M by one or more persons;
(b) the Commissioner decides, under
section 101N, that the patentee is not entitled to the grant of the
patent; and
(c) the Commissioner decides that one
or more of the opponents are eligible persons in relation to the invention the
subject of the patent, so far as claimed in any claim of the patent (the
original claim); and
(d) a complete application is made by
one or more of the eligible persons under section 29 for a patent in
relation to the invention;
the Commissioner may grant an innovation patent for the
invention, so far as so claimed, to those eligible persons.
Opposition to innovation patent if patentee entitled to
grant of patent with other person
(4) If:
(a) an innovation patent is opposed
under section 101M by one or more persons; and
(b) the Commissioner decides that one
or more of the opponents and the original patentee are eligible persons in
relation to the invention the subject of the patent, so far as claimed in any
claim of the patent (the original claim); and
(c) a complete application is made by
one or more of the eligible persons under section 29 for a patent in
relation to the invention;
the Commissioner may grant an innovation patent for the
invention, so far as so claimed, to those eligible persons jointly.
(5) If the Commissioner grants a patent under
subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4), the claims of that patent granted have
the same priority date as that of the original claim referred to in the
respective subsection.
34
Applications by eligible persons arising out of Court proceedings
(1) If, in any proceedings in a court
relating to a patent (the first patent), the court is satisfied
either:
(a) that one or more persons are
eligible persons in relation to an invention so far as claimed in any claim of
the patent (the original claim) but that the patentee is
not an eligible person; or
(b) that the patentee and another
person or persons are eligible persons in relation to an invention so far as
claimed in any claim of the first patent (the original claim);
the court, in addition to any other order it may make in
the proceedings, may, by order, declare that the persons who it is satisfied
are eligible persons are eligible persons in relation to that invention so far
as so claimed.
(2) Subject to subsection (3), if a
complete application is made under section 29 by one or more declared
persons, the Commissioner may grant a patent for the invention, so far as
claimed in the original claim, to those declared persons jointly.
(3) If the Commissioner grants a patent under
subsection (2), the claims of that patent have the same priority date as
that of the original claim.
35
Applications by eligible persons following revocation by Commissioner
(1) If the Commissioner:
(a) revokes a patent under section 137;
and
(b) is satisfied:
(i) on application made by
one or more persons in accordance with the regulations, that the persons are
eligible persons in relation to the invention concerned, so far as so claimed
in any claim of the revoked patent (the original claim)
and that the former patentee is not such an eligible person; or
(ii) on application made by
one or more persons in accordance with the regulations, that the persons and
the former patentee are eligible persons in relation to the invention
concerned, so far as is claimed in any claim of the revoked patent (the original
claim);
the Commissioner may declare in writing that the eligible
persons are such eligible persons.
(1A) If a complete application is made under
section 29 by one or more of the declared persons, the Commissioner may
grant a patent for the invention, so far as so claimed, to those declared
persons jointly.
(1B) If the Commissioner grants a patent under subsection (1A),
the claims of that patent have the same priority date as that of the original
claim as referred to in subsection (1).
(2) The Commissioner must not make a
declaration without first giving the former patentee a reasonable opportunity
to be heard.
(3) An appeal lies to the Federal Court
against a decision of the Commissioner making, or refusing to make, a
declaration.
36
Other applications by eligible persons
(1) If:
(a) a patent application has been made
and, in the case of a complete application, the patent request and complete
specification have not been accepted; and
(b) an application for a declaration
by the Commissioner is made by one or more persons (the section 36
applicants) in accordance with the regulations; and
(c) the Commissioner is satisfied, in
relation to an invention disclosed in the specification filed in relation to
the application for the patent:
(i) that the nominated
person is not an eligible person, but that the section 36 applicants
are eligible persons; or
(ii) that the nominated
person is an eligible person, but that the section 36 applicants
are also eligible persons;
the Commissioner may declare in writing that the persons
who the Commissioner is satisfied are eligible persons are eligible persons in
relation to the invention as so disclosed.
(2) The Commissioner may make a declaration
under subsection (1) whether or not the patent application lapses or is
withdrawn.
(3) The Commissioner must not make a
declaration under subsection (1) without first giving the nominated person
a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
(4) If a complete application is made under
section 29 by one or more of the declared persons, the priority date of
the claims of a patent for the invention granted to the person, or persons, as
the case may be, must be determined under the regulations.
(5) An appeal lies to the Federal Court
against a decision by the Commissioner under this section.
37
Complete application may be treated as provisional
(1) Where a complete application is made, the
applicant may, at any time during the prescribed period, by written request,
ask the Commissioner to direct that the application be treated as a provisional
application.
(2) A person is not entitled to make a
request if the patent request and specification filed in respect of the
application have been accepted or have become open to public inspection.
(3) On receiving a request, the Commissioner
must give a direction as asked.
(4) Where the Commissioner gives a direction,
the complete application is to be taken, for the purposes of this Act, to be,
and to have always been, a provisional application.
38
Time for making complete application
(1) If an applicant makes a provisional
application, the applicant may make one or more complete applications
associated with the provisional application at any time within the prescribed
period.
(2) In this
section:
applicant
includes a person entitled to make a request under section 113 in relation
to the relevant patent application.
[Note: see also section 5 for
requirements relating to associated applications.]
Division 2—Specifications
40
Specifications
(1) A provisional specification must describe
the invention.
(2) A complete specification must:
(a) describe the invention fully,
including the best method known to the applicant of performing the invention;
and
(b) where it relates to an application
for a standard patent—end with a claim or claims defining the invention; and
(c) where it relates to an application
for an innovation patent—end with at least one and no more than 5 claims
defining the invention.
(3) The claim or claims must be clear and
succinct and fairly based on the matter described in the specification.
(4) The claim or claims must relate to one
invention only.
41
Specifications: micro‑organisms
(1) To the extent that an invention is a
micro‑organism, the complete specification is to be taken to comply with
paragraph 40(2)(a), so far as it requires a description of the micro‑organism,
if the deposit requirements are satisfied in relation to the micro‑organism.
(2) Where:
(a) an invention involves the use,
modification or cultivation of a micro‑organism, other than the micro‑organism
mentioned in subsection (1); and
(b) a person skilled in the relevant
art in the patent area could not reasonably be expected to perform the invention
without having a sample of the micro‑organism before starting to perform the
invention; and
(c) the micro‑organism is not
reasonably available to a person skilled in the relevant art in the patent
area;
the specification is to be taken to comply with paragraph
40(2)(a), so far as it requires a description of the micro‑organism, if, and
only if, the deposit requirements are satisfied in relation to the micro‑organism.
(3) For the purposes of this section, a micro‑organism
may be taken to be reasonably available to a person even if it is not so
available in the patent area.
(4) Where:
(a) the requirements specified in
paragraph 6(c) or (d) cease to be satisfied in relation to a micro‑organism;
and
(b) steps are taken at a later time
within the prescribed period in accordance with such provisions (if any) of the
regulations as are applicable; and
(c) as
a result of those steps, if the period during which those requirements are not
satisfied is disregarded, those requirements would be satisfied at that later
time;
those requirements are to be taken to have been satisfied
during the period mentioned in paragraph (c), and such provisions as are
prescribed have effect for the protection or compensation of persons who
availed themselves, or took definite steps by way of contract or otherwise to
avail themselves, of the invention during that period.
[Note: see also section 6 in
relation to satisfaction of deposit requirements.]
42
Micro‑organisms ceasing to be reasonably available
(1) Where:
(a) a complete application has been
made for a patent, or a patent has been granted for an invention of a kind
mentioned in paragraph 41(2)(a); and
(b) the relevant micro‑organism was,
at the date of filing of the complete specification, reasonably available
(within the meaning of section 41) to a skilled person working in the
relevant art in the patent area; and
(c) the
micro‑organism has ceased to be so available;
a prescribed court or the Commissioner, on application
made in accordance with the regulations, or the Commissioner, on his or her own
motion, may declare that the specification does not comply with section 40
unless the deposit requirements are satisfied in relation to the micro‑organism.
(2) Where a
declaration is made under subsection (1):
(a) this Act has effect in relation to
the specification accordingly; and
(b) section 6 applies as if the
references in that section to the date of filing of the specification were
references to a date specified in the declaration for the purposes of this
subsection.
(3) Subsection (2) does not limit the
operation of section 223.
(4) Where:
(a) an application is made under subsection (1);
or
(b) the
Commissioner proposes to make a declaration under that subsection on his or her
own motion;
the applicant for the patent, or the patentee, as the case
may be, must be notified, in accordance with the regulations, of the
application or proposal and is entitled to appear and be heard.
(5) A declaration by the Commissioner must be
made in accordance with the regulations.
(6) An office copy of a declaration by a
prescribed court must be served on the Commissioner by the Registrar or other
appropriate officer of the court.
(7) An appeal lies to the Federal Court
against a decision of the Commissioner under subsection (1).
[Note: see also section 6 in
relation to satisfaction of deposit requirements.]
Division 3—Priority dates
43
Priority dates
(1) Each claim of a specification must have a
priority date.
(2) The priority date of a claim is:
(a) the date of filing of the
specification; or
(b) where the regulations provide for
the determination of a different date as the priority date—the date determined
under the regulations.
(3) Where a claim defines more than one form
of an invention, then, for the purposes of determining the priority date of the
claim, it must be treated as if it were a separate claim for each form of the
invention that is defined.
(4) The priority date of a claim of a
specification may be different from the priority date of any other claim of the
specification.
Priority date if claim arises from further application
for an innovation patent provided for in section 79C
(5) If:
(a) an innovation patent has been
granted following an application provided for in section 79C; and
(b) a request for the examination of
the patent has been made within the period prescribed in the regulations;
the priority date of each claim in the specification is
the date determined under the regulations.
(6) If:
(a) an innovation patent has been
granted following an application provided for in section 79C; and
(b) a request for the examination of
the patent has not been made within the period prescribed in the regulations;
the priority date of each claim in the specification must
not be a date earlier than the date of filing of the application provided for
in section 79C.
Part 2—Examination of standard patent requests and specifications
Division 1—Examination
44
Request for examination
(1) Where a complete application for a
standard patent has been made, the applicant may, within the prescribed period
and in accordance with the regulations, ask for an examination of the patent
request and specification relating to the application.
(2) Where a complete application has been
made for a standard patent, the Commissioner may, on one or more of the
prescribed grounds and in accordance with the regulations, direct the applicant
to ask, within the prescribed period, for an examination of the patent request
and complete specification relating to the application.
(3) Where the patent request and
specification relating to a complete application for a standard patent are open
to public inspection, a person may, in accordance with the regulations, require
the Commissioner to direct the applicant to ask, within the prescribed period,
for an examination of the request and specification.
(4) Where required under subsection (3),
the Commissioner must give a direction accordingly, unless the applicant has
already asked, or been directed to ask, for an examination of the patent
request and specification.
45
Examination [see also Table B]
(1) Where an applicant asks for an
examination of a patent request and complete specification relating to
an application for a standard patent, the Commissioner must examine the request
and specification and report on:
(a) whether the specification complies
with section 40; and
(b) whether, to the best of his or her
knowledge, the invention, so far as claimed, satisfies the criterion mentioned
in paragraph 18(1)(a); and
(c) whether, to the best of his or her
knowledge, the invention, so far as claimed in any claim and when compared with
the prior art base as it existed before the priority date of that claim:
(i) is novel; and
(ii) involves an inventive
step; and
(d) such other matters (if any) as are
prescribed.
(1A) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(c),
the prior art base is to be taken not to include information made publicly
available only through the doing of an act (whether in or out of the patent
area).
(2) The examination must be carried out in
accordance with the regulations.
(3) The applicant must inform the
Commissioner, in accordance with the regulations, of the results of the
following searches carried out for the purpose of assessing the patentability
of an invention disclosed in the complete specification or a corresponding
application filed outside Australia:
(a) any documentary searches by, or on
behalf of, a foreign patent office, other than searches prescribed by the
regulations;
(b) the documentary searches
prescribed by the regulations.
(4) Subsection (3) only applies to
searches completed before the grant of the patent.
(5) In subsection (4):
completed, in relation to a search, has the
meaning prescribed by the regulations.
46
Request for deferment of examination
(1) Where:
(a) a complete application for a
standard patent has been made; and
(b) a prescribed application for a
patent has been made in a prescribed foreign country; and
(c) a patent has not been granted in
respect of the prescribed application; and
(d) the
applicant has been directed by the Commissioner to ask for an examination of
the patent request and specification relating to the application mentioned in paragraph (a),
being a direction given on a ground prescribed for the purposes of this
paragraph;
the applicant may, instead of asking for an examination as
directed, ask for deferment of the examination.
(2) A request for deferment must be made in
accordance with the regulations.
(3) Where a request for deferment is made:
(a) the examination of the patent
request and specification must be deferred accordingly; and
(b) the application does not lapse
merely because of failure by the applicant to ask for an examination in
accordance with the Commissioner’s direction.
Division 2—Modified examination
47 Request
for modified examination
(1) Where:
(a) a complete application for a
standard patent has been made; and
(b) a
patent has been granted in a prescribed foreign country in respect of a
prescribed application made in that country;
the applicant may, instead of asking for an examination,
ask for a modified examination of the patent request and specification relating
to the application.
(2) The applicant may withdraw a request for
a modified examination at any time before acceptance of the patent request and
specification and ask for an examination under section 44 instead.
48
Modified examination [see also Table B]
(1) When an applicant asks for a modified
examination of a patent request and complete specification relating to an
application for a standard patent, the Commissioner must examine the request
and specification and report on:
(a) whether, to the best of his or her
knowledge, the invention, so far as claimed, satisfies the criterion mentioned
in paragraph 18(1)(a); and
(b) whether, to the best of his or her
knowledge, the invention, so far as claimed in any claim and when compared with
the prior art base as it existed before the priority date of that claim:
(i) is novel; and
(ii) involves an inventive
step; and
(c) such other matters (if any) as are
prescribed.
(1A) For the
purposes of paragraph (1)(b), the prior art base is to be taken not to
include information made publicly available only through the doing of an act
(whether in or out of the patent area).
(2) The modified examination must be carried
out in accordance with the regulations.
Part 3—Acceptance
Division 1—Acceptance of standard patents
49
Acceptance of patent request: standard patent
(1) Subject to section 50, the
Commissioner must accept a patent request and complete specification relating
to an application for a standard patent, if:
(a) the Commissioner is satisfied that
the invention, so far as claimed, satisfies the criteria mentioned in paragraph
18(1)(b); and
(b) the Commissioner considers that:
(i) there is no lawful
ground of objection (other than a ground in respect of paragraph 18(1)(b)) to
the request and specification; or
(ii) any such ground of
objection has been removed.
(2) If subsection (1) does not apply,
the Commissioner may refuse to accept the request and specification.
(3) The Commissioner must, if asked to do so
by the applicant in writing, postpone acceptance of a patent request and
complete specification until such day as the applicant specifies.
(4) The applicant cannot, for the purposes of
subsection (3), specify a day that is after the end of the period
prescribed for the purposes of paragraph 142(2)(e).
(5) Where the Commissioner accepts a patent
request and complete specification relating to an application for a standard
patent, the Commissioner must:
(a) notify the applicant in writing of
the acceptance; and
(b) publish a notice of the acceptance
in the Official Journal.
(6) The notice
mentioned in paragraph (5)(b) must:
(a) if the patent request and complete
specification have been subjected to a modified examination—include a statement
to the effect that the acceptance has resulted from a modified examination; and
(b) if the patent request and complete
specification have not already become open to public inspection—include a statement
to the effect that the patent request and specification are open to public
inspection.
(7) Where the Commissioner refuses to accept
a patent request and complete specification relating to an application for a
standard patent, the Commissioner must notify the applicant in writing of the
reasons for the refusal and publish a notice of the refusal in the Official
Journal.
50
Application or grant may be refused in certain cases
(1) The Commissioner may refuse to accept a
request and specification relating to a standard patent, or to grant a standard
patent:
(a) for an invention the use of which
would be contrary to law; or
(b) on the ground that the
specification claims as an invention:
(i) a substance that is
capable of being used as food or medicine (whether for human beings or animals
and whether for internal or external use) and is a mere mixture of known
ingredients; or
(ii) a process producing
such a substance by mere admixture.
(2) The Commissioner may refuse to accept a
specification relating to a standard patent containing a claim that includes
the name of a person as the name, or part of the name, of the invention so far
as claimed in that claim.
51
Appeal
An appeal lies to the Federal Court
against a decision of the Commissioner under this Division.
Division 2—Acceptance of innovation patents
52
Formalities check and acceptance of innovation patents
(1) If a complete application for an
innovation patent is made, the Commissioner must undertake a formalities check
in respect of the application.
(2) If satisfied that the application passes
the formalities check, the Commissioner must accept the patent request and
complete specification.
Chapter 4—Publication
53
Publication of certain information about applicants etc.
[see
also Table B]
Where a patent application is made, the
Commissioner must publish in the Official Journal the prescribed
information about the applicant and the application.
54
Notice of publication
(1) Where a complete specification filed in
respect of an application for a standard patent (other than a PCT application)
has not become open to public inspection, the Commissioner must, if asked to do
so by the applicant, publish, in accordance with the regulations, a notice in
the Official Journal that the complete specification is open to public
inspection.
(2) If subsection 41(2) applies to a
specification, the applicant cannot make a request under subsection (1) in
relation to the specification unless the specification includes the particulars
mentioned in paragraph 6(c).
(3) Where:
(a) a complete specification has been
filed in respect of an application for a standard patent (other than a PCT
application); and
(b) the prescribed period has ended;
and
(c) the
specification is not open to public inspection;
the Commissioner must publish a notice in the Official
Journal that the specification is open to public inspection, unless the
application has lapsed or been refused or withdrawn.
(4) Where:
(a) a divisional application for a
standard patent provided for in section 79B (other than a PCT application)
is made in respect of an original application, whether a PCT application or
not; and
(b) the
complete specification filed in respect of the original application was open to
public inspection when the divisional application was made;
the Commissioner must publish a notice in the Official
Journal that the complete specification filed in respect of the divisional
application is open to public inspection.
(5) Where a divisional application for a
standard patent provided for in section 79B (other than a PCT application)
is made in respect of an original application that is not a PCT application
and:
(a) a notice is published in the Official
Journal that the complete specification filed in respect of the original
application is open to public inspection; or
(b) a
notice is published in the Official Journal that the complete
specification filed in respect of the divisional application is open to public
inspection;
the Commissioner must also publish in the Official
Journal a notice that:
(c) where paragraph (a)
applies—the complete specification filed in respect of the divisional
application is open to public inspection; or
(d) where paragraph (b)
applies—the complete specification filed in respect of the original application
is open to public inspection.
(6) Where:
(a) a divisional application for a
standard patent provided for in section 79B (other than a PCT application)
is made in respect of an original application that is a PCT application; and
(b) a
notice is published in the Official Journal that the complete
specification filed in respect of the original application is open to public
inspection;
the Commissioner must also publish in the Official
Journal a notice that the complete specification filed in respect of the
divisional application is open to public inspection.
55
Documents open to public inspection
(1) Where a notice is published under section 54
or under subsection 62(3), the specification concerned, and such other
documents (if any) as are prescribed, are open to public inspection.
(2) Where a notice is published under
paragraph 49(5)(b) in relation to an application for a standard patent, or
under subsection 62(2) in relation to the grant of an innovation patent, the
following documents are open to public inspection:
(a) all documents (other than
prescribed documents) filed in relation to the application or the patent,
whether before or after the acceptance or grant;
(b) all documents (other than
prescribed documents) filed, after the patent ceases, expires or is revoked, in
relation to the former patent;
(c) copies
of all documents relating to the application or patent (other than prescribed
documents) given by the Commissioner to the applicant or patentee, or the
former applicant or patentee;
being documents that have not already become open to
public inspection.
(3) Subject to section 90, a
specification, or other document, is to be taken to have been published on the
day on which it becomes open to public inspection unless it has been published
otherwise before that day.
56
Certain documents not to be published
(1) Except as otherwise provided by this Act,
documents of the kind mentioned in section 55:
(a) must not be published or be open
to public inspection; and
(b) are not liable to be inspected or
produced before the Commissioner or in a legal proceeding unless the
Commissioner, court, or any person having power to order inspection or
production, directs that the inspection or production be allowed.
(2) Notice of an application for the
production in legal proceedings of a document of the kind mentioned in section 55
must be given to the Commissioner, who is entitled to be heard on the
application.
57
Effect of publication of complete specification
(1) After a complete specification relating
to an application for a standard patent has become open to public inspection
and until a patent is granted on the application, the applicant has the same
rights as he or she would have had if a patent for the invention had been
granted on the day when the specification became open to public inspection.
(3) Subsection (1) does not give the
applicant a right to start proceedings in respect of the doing of an act
unless:
(a) a patent is granted on the
application; and
(b) the act would, if done after the
grant of the patent, have constituted an infringement of a claim of the
specification.
(4) It is a defence to proceedings under subsection (1)
in respect of an act done:
(a) after the complete specification
became open to public inspection; and
(b) before the patent request was
accepted:
if the defendant proves that a patent could not validly
have been granted to the applicant in respect of the claims (as framed when the
act was done) that are alleged to have been infringed by the doing of the act.
58
Result of search may be disclosed
The Commissioner may disclose the result
of any search made for the purpose of making a report under this Act.
Chapter 5—Opposition to grant of standard patent
59
Opposition to grant of standard patent
The Minister or any other person may, in
accordance with the regulations, oppose the grant of a standard patent on one
or more of the following grounds, but on no other ground:
(a) that the nominated person is
either:
(i) not entitled to a
grant of a patent for the invention; or
(ii) entitled to a grant of
a patent for the invention but only in conjunction with some other person;
(b) that the invention is not a
patentable invention;
(c) that the specification filed in
respect of the complete application does not comply with subsection 40(2) or
(3).
60
Hearing and decision by Commissioner
(1) Where the grant of a standard patent is
opposed, the Commissioner must decide the case in accordance with the
regulations.
(2) The Commissioner must give the applicant
and the opponent a reasonable opportunity to be heard before deciding a case.
(3) The Commissioner may, in deciding a case,
take into account any ground on which the grant of a standard patent may be
opposed, whether relied upon by the opponent or not.
(4) The applicant, and any opponent, may
appeal to the Federal Court against a decision of the Commissioner under this
section.
Chapter 6—Grant and term of patents
Part 1—Grant
61
Grant of standard patent
(1) Subject to section 100A, the Commissioner
must grant a standard patent, by sealing a standard patent in the approved
form, if:
(a) there is no opposition to the
grant; or
(b) in spite of opposition, the
Commissioner’s decision, or the decision on appeal, is that a standard patent
should be granted.
(2) A standard patent must be granted within
the prescribed period.
62
Grant and publication of innovation patent
(1) If:
(a) the Commissioner accepts a patent
request and complete specification filed in respect of an application for an
innovation patent; and
(b) a prohibition order is not in
force under subsection 152(3) or 173(1) in relation to the application;
the Commissioner must grant the innovation patent by
sealing an innovation patent in the approved form.
(2) If an innovation patent is granted, the
Commissioner must publish a notice in the Official Journal stating that:
(a) the innovation patent has been
granted; and
(b) the patent request and complete
specification are open to public inspection.
(3) If:
(a) a divisional application provided
for in section 79B is made for an innovation patent; and
(b) a
notice is published in the Official Journal that the complete
specification filed in respect of the divisional application is open to public
inspection;
the Commissioner must also publish in the Official
Journal a notice that the complete specification filed in respect of the
original application on which the divisional application is based is open to
public inspection.
63
Joint patentees
A patent may be granted to 2 or more
nominated persons jointly.
64
Grant: multiple applications
(1) Subject to this section, where there are
2 or more applications for patents for identical, or substantially identical,
inventions, the granting of a patent on one of those applications does not
prevent the granting of a patent on any of the other applications.
(2) Where:
(a) an application for a standard
patent claims an invention that is the same as an invention that is the subject
of a patent and is made by the same inventor; and
(b) the
relevant claim or claims in each of the complete specifications have the same
priority date or dates;
a standard patent cannot be granted on the application.
65
Date of patent
The date of a patent is:
(a) the date of filing of the relevant
complete specification; or
(b) where the regulations provide for
the determination of a different date as the date of a patent—the date
determined under the regulations.
66
Sealing of duplicate of patent
(1) The Commissioner may seal a duplicate of
a patent if satisfied that the patent is lost, stolen, damaged or destroyed.
(2) If:
(a) the Commissioner is satisfied that
particulars on a patent are incorrect because of an error or omission by the
Commissioner; and
(b) the patent is returned to the
Commissioner;
the Commissioner may seal a duplicate of the patent.
Part 2—Term
67
Term of standard patent
The term of a standard patent is 20
years from the date of the patent.
68
Term of innovation patent
The term of an innovation patent is 8
years from the date of the patent.
Part 3—Extension of term of standard patents relating to
pharmaceutical substances
70
Applications for extension of patent
(1) The patentee of a standard patent may
apply to the Commissioner for an extension of the term of the patent if the
requirements set out in subsections (2), (3) and (4) are satisfied.
(2) Either or both of the following
conditions must be satisfied:
(a) one or more pharmaceutical
substances per se must in substance be disclosed in the complete
specification of the patent and in substance fall within the scope of the claim
or claims of that specification;
(b) one or more pharmaceutical
substances when produced by a process that involves the use of recombinant DNA
technology, must in substance be disclosed in the complete specification of the
patent and in substance fall within the scope of the claim or claims of that
specification.
(3) Both of the following conditions must be
satisfied in relation to at least one of those pharmaceutical substances:
(a) goods containing, or consisting
of, the substance must be included in the Australian Register of Therapeutic
Goods;
(b) the period beginning on the date
of the patent and ending on the first regulatory approval date for the
substance must be at least 5 years.
Note: Section 65 sets out the date of a patent.
(4) The term of the patent must not have been
previously extended under this Part.
(5) For the purposes of this section, the first
regulatory approval date, in relation to a pharmaceutical
substance, is:
(a) if no pre‑TGA marketing approval
was given in relation to the substance—the date of commencement of the first
inclusion in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods of goods that
contain, or consist of, the substance; or
(b) if pre‑TGA marketing approval was
given in relation to the substance—the date of the first approval.
(6) For the purposes of this section, pre‑TGA
marketing approval, in relation to a pharmaceutical substance, is an
approval (however described) by a Minister, or a Secretary of a Department, to:
(a) market the substance, or a product
containing the substance, in Australia; or
(b) import into Australia, for general marketing, the substance or a product containing the substance.
71
Form and timing of an application
Form of application
(1) An application for an extension of the
term of a standard patent must:
(a) be in the approved form; and
(b) be accompanied by such documents
(if any) as are ascertained in accordance with the regulations; and
(c) be accompanied by such information
(if any) as is ascertained in accordance with the regulations.
For this purpose, document includes a copy
of a document.
Timing of application
(2) An application for an extension of the
term of a standard patent must be made during the term of the patent and within
6 months after the latest of the following dates:
(a) the date the patent was granted;
(b) the date of commencement of the
first inclusion in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods of goods that
contain, or consist of, any of the pharmaceutical substances referred to in
subsection 70(3);
(c) the date of commencement of this
section.
72
Notification and public inspection of application
If a
patentee makes an application for an extension of the term of a standard
patent, the Commissioner must publish in the Official Journal a notice
that the application has been made and is open to public inspection.
73
Withdrawal of application
(1) A patentee who has applied for an
extension of the term of a standard patent may, by notice in writing to the
Commissioner, withdraw the application.
(2) If an application for an extension of the
term of a standard patent is withdrawn, the Commissioner must publish in the Official
Journal a notice stating that the application has been withdrawn.
74
Acceptance or refusal of application
Acceptance
(1) If a patentee of a standard patent makes
an application for an extension of the term of the patent, the Commissioner
must accept the application if the Commissioner is satisfied that the
requirements of sections 70 and 71 are satisfied in relation to the
application.
(2) If the Commissioner accepts the
application, the Commissioner must:
(a) notify the applicant in writing of
the acceptance; and
(b) publish a notice of the acceptance
in the Official Journal.
Refusal
(3) The Commissioner must refuse to accept
the application if the Commissioner is not satisfied that the requirements of
sections 70 and 71 are satisfied in relation to the application.
(4) If the
Commissioner refuses to accept the application, the Commissioner must:
(a) notify the applicant in writing of
the reasons for the refusal; and
(b) publish a notice of the refusal in
the Official Journal.
75
Opposition to grant of extension
(1) The Minister or any other person may, in
accordance with the regulations, oppose the grant of an extension of the term
of a standard patent on the ground that one or more of the requirements of
sections 70 and 71 are not satisfied in relation to the application for
the extension. The Minister or other person may not oppose the grant of the
extension on any other ground.
(2) If the grant of an extension of the term
of a standard patent is opposed, the Commissioner must decide the case in
accordance with the regulations.
(3) The Commissioner must give the applicant
and the opponent a reasonable opportunity to be heard before deciding a case.
(4) The applicant, and any opponent, may
appeal to the Federal Court against a decision of the Commissioner under this
section.
76
Grant of extension
(1) The Commissioner must grant an extension
of the term of a standard patent if:
(a) there is no opposition to the
grant; or
(b) in spite of opposition, the
Commissioner’s decision, or the decision on appeal, is that the extension
should be granted.
(2) If the Commissioner grants an extension,
the Commissioner must notify the applicant in writing of the grant and publish
a notice of the grant in the Official Journal.
76A
Notification of extension to the Secretary, Health and Family Services
In respect of each application for an
extension approved by the Commissioner under section 76 in a financial
year, the patent holder must lodge with the Secretary of the Department, before
the end of the following financial year, a return setting out the following
information:
(a) details of the amount and origin
of any Commonwealth funds spent in the research and development of the drug
which was the subject of the application; and
(b) the
name of any body:
(i) with which the
applicant has a contractual agreement; and
(ii) which is in receipt of
Commonwealth funds; and
(c) the total amount spent on each
type of research and development, including pre‑clinical research and clinical
trials, in respect of the drug which was the subject of the application.
77
Calculation of term of extension
(1) If the Commissioner grants an extension
of the term of a standard patent, the term of the extension is equal to:
(a) the period beginning on the date
of the patent and ending on the earliest first regulatory approval date (as
defined by section 70) in relation to any of the pharmaceutical substances
referred to in subsection 70(2);
reduced (but not below zero) by:
(b) 5 years.
Note: Section 65 sets out the date of a patent.
(2) However, the term of the extension cannot
be longer than 5 years.
78
Exclusive rights of patentee are limited if extension granted
If the Commissioner grants an extension
of the term of a standard patent, the exclusive rights of the patentee during
the term of the extension are not infringed:
(a) by a person exploiting:
(i) a pharmaceutical
substance per se that is in substance disclosed in the complete
specification of the patent and in substance falls within the scope of the
claim or claims of that specification; or
(ii) a pharmaceutical
substance when produced by a process that involves the use of recombinant DNA
technology, that is in substance disclosed in the complete specification of the
patent and in substance falls within the scope of the claim or claims of that
specification;
for a purpose other than
therapeutic use; or
(b) by
a person exploiting any form of the invention other than:
(i) a pharmaceutical
substance per se that is in substance disclosed in the complete
specification of the patent and in substance falls within the scope of the claim
or claims of that specification; or
(ii) a pharmaceutical
substance when produced by a process that involves the use of recombinant DNA
technology, that is in substance disclosed in the complete specification of the
patent and in substance falls within the scope of the claim or claims of that
specification.
79
Rights of patentee if extension granted after patent expires
If:
(a) a patentee applies for an
extension of the term of a standard patent; and
(b) the term of the patent expires
before the application is determined; and
(c) the extension is granted;
the patentee has, after the extension is granted, the same
rights to start proceedings in respect of the doing of an act during the
period:
(d) commencing on the expiration of
the term of the patent; and
(e) ending on the day on which the
extension was granted;
as if the extension had been granted at the time when the
act was done.
79A
Commissioner not to make decision if court proceedings pending
If:
(a) a patentee of a standard patent
applies for an extension of the term of the patent; and
(b) relevant proceedings in relation
to the patent are pending;
the Commissioner must not make any decision under this
Part in relation to the patent without the leave of the court.
Chapter 6A—Divisional applications
79B
Divisional applications prior to grant of patent
(1) If a complete patent application for a
patent is made (but has not lapsed or been refused or withdrawn), the applicant
may, in accordance with the regulations, make a further complete application
for a patent for an invention:
(a) disclosed in the specification
filed in respect of the first‑mentioned application; and
(b) where the first‑mentioned
application is for a standard patent and at least 3 months have elapsed since the
publication of a notice of acceptance of the relevant patent request and
specification in the Official Journal—falling within the scope of the
claims of the accepted specification.
(1A) The reference to a complete patent
application first‑mentioned in subsection (1) does not include a reference
to a divisional application for an innovation patent provided for in section 79C.
(2) In this section:
applicant has the same meaning as in section 38.
79C
Divisional applications for innovation patents may be made after grant of an
innovation patent
Applications may be made
(1) A patentee of an innovation patent (the first
patent) may, in accordance with the regulations, make a complete
application for another innovation patent for a further invention disclosed in
the first patent if the invention was disclosed in the complete specification
filed in respect of the application on which the first patent was sealed.
(2) The patentee may make the further
complete application only during the period:
(a) starting when an examination of
the first patent begins; and
(b) ending
when any of the following happens:
(i) the term of the first
patent ends;
(ii) the first patent is
revoked;
(iii) the first patent
ceases;
(iv) a period prescribed by
the regulations for the purposes of this subparagraph ends.
When does an examination begin?
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2),
an examination of the patent begins:
(a) if the examination has been
requested under paragraph 101A(b)—on the day the request was made; or
(b) if the Commissioner decided to
examine the patent under paragraph 101A(a)—on the day the Commissioner made
that decision.
Chapter 7—Patents of addition
80
Chapter does not apply to innovation patents
This Chapter does not apply in relation
to innovation patents.
81
Grant of patent of addition
(1) Where:
(a) a patent for an invention (in this
Chapter called the main invention) has been applied for or
granted; and
(b) the applicant or patentee (or a
person authorised by the applicant or patentee) applies for a further patent
for an improvement in, or modification of, the main invention; and
(c) the
application for that further patent is made in accordance with the regulations;
the Commissioner may, subject to this Act and the
regulations, grant a patent of addition for the improvement or modification.
(2) A patent request and complete
specification relating to an application for a patent of addition must not be
examined before a request is made for the examination of the patent request and
complete specification relating to the application for the patent for the main
invention.
(3) A patent of addition must not be sealed
before the patent for the main invention is sealed.
(4) An appeal lies to the Federal Court
against a decision of the Commissioner under this section.
82
Revocation of patent and grant of patent of addition instead
(1) Where:
(a) an invention that is an
improvement in, or modification of, a main invention is the subject of an
independent patent; and
(b) the
patentee of the independent patent is also the patentee of the patent for the
main invention;
the Commissioner may, on an application made by the
patentee, revoke the independent patent and grant a patent of addition for the
improvement or modification.
(2) A patent of addition granted under this
section must be given the same date as the date of the independent patent that
is revoked.
(3) An appeal lies to the Federal Court
against a decision of the Commissioner refusing an application under this
section.
83
Term of patent of addition
Usual term
(1) The general rule is that a patent of
addition remains in force for so long as the patent for the main invention
remains in force. However, this rule is subject to the exceptions set out in subsections (3)
and (4).
(2) The term of a patent of addition may be
extended under Part 3 of Chapter 6, even though the patent for the
main invention is not extended under that Part.
Patent of addition extended
(3) If the term of a patent of addition is
extended under Part 3 of Chapter 6:
(a) the extension begins at the end of
the unextended term of the patent for the main invention; and
(b) when the extension begins, the
patent of addition becomes an independent patent.
Patent for main invention extended
(4) If:
(a) the term of the patent for the
main invention is extended under Part 3 of Chapter 6; and
(b) the
term of the patent of addition is not extended under that Part;
the term of the patent of addition expires at the end of
the unextended term of the patent for the main invention.
85
Revocation of patent for main invention
(1) If the patent for the main invention is
revoked by a prescribed court, or by the Commissioner under section 101 or
137, the patent of addition becomes an independent patent unless otherwise
ordered by:
(a) where the patent is revoked by a
prescribed court—that court; or
(b) in any other case—the
Commissioner.
(2) Where a patent of addition becomes an
independent patent under this section, its term cannot be more than the
unexpired part of the term of the patent for the main invention.
86
Renewal fees not payable
A fee is not payable for the renewal of
a patent of addition.
87
Fees payable where patent of addition becomes an independent patent
The fees payable after a patent of
addition becomes an independent patent, and the dates when they become payable,
are to be determined by reference to the date of the independent patent.
Chapter 8—PCT applications and convention applications
Part 1—PCT applications
88 PCT
applications
(1) Subject to this section, a PCT
application must, for the purposes of this Act other than this Part, be treated
as a complete application under this Act for a standard patent.
(3) The description, drawings and claims
contained in a PCT application must be treated as a complete specification
filed in respect of the application.
(4) The filing date of a PCT application is
to be taken to be its international filing date.
(5) For the purposes of this Act, an
indication, in relation to a deposited micro‑organism furnished under Rule 13 bis.
4, in relation to a PCT application, is to be taken to be included in the
description contained in the PCT application even if the indication is
contained in another document.
(6) The
reference in subsection (5) to Rule 13 bis. 4 is a reference to
Rule 13 bis. 4 of the Regulations mentioned in the definition of PCT
in Schedule 1.
[Note: international filing date
is defined in Schedule 1: see also section 10.]
89
Modified application of Act [see also Table B]
(1) A PCT application is to be taken to
comply with the prescribed requirements of this Act and the regulations that
relate to patent applications for standard patents but is not to be taken,
merely because of section 88, to comply with any other such requirements
that apply to it.
(2) The description, drawings and claims
contained in a PCT application are not to be taken, merely because of section 88,
to comply with the requirements of section 40.
(3) An applicant is not entitled to ask that
any action be taken, or that he or she be allowed to take any action, under
this Act in relation to a PCT application unless:
(a) if the application was not filed
in the receiving Office in English—a translation of the application into
English, verified in accordance with the regulations, has been filed; and
(b) in any case—the prescribed
documents have been filed and the prescribed fees paid.
(4) If a translation of a PCT application has
been filed, being a translation of the kind mentioned in paragraph (3)(a),
the description and claims, and any matter associated with the drawings,
contained in the application are to be taken to have been amended, on the day
on which the translation was filed, by substituting the translation of the
description, claims and matter for the original.
(5) Where:
(a) a PCT application has been amended
under Article 19 of the PCT; or
(b) a PCT application in respect of
which Australia has been elected under Chapter II of the PCT within the period
specified in Article 39 of the PCT has been amended under Article 34 of the
PCT; or
(c) a
PCT application has been rectified under Rule 91 of the Regulations mentioned
in the definition of PCT in Schedule 1;
the description, drawings and claims contained in the
application are, for the purposes of this Act, to be taken to have been amended
on the day on which that amendment or rectification was made.
90
Publication of PCT applications [see also Table B]
A PCT application is to be taken to have
become open to public inspection, and to have been published in Australia:
(a) where a notice in relation to the
application is published under subsection 92(1) or (2)—on the day on which the
notice is so published; or
(b) where a notice in relation to the
application is published under subsection 92(3)—on the day on which a copy of
the application, as so published, is received in the Patent Office.
91
Application of certain provisions to PCT applications
For the purposes of applying section 57
to a PCT application, references to the complete specification becoming open to
public inspection are references to the PCT application being taken to have
become open to public inspection under section 90.
92
Notice of publication [see also Table B]
(1) Where, in relation to a PCT application
that has not lapsed, or been withdrawn or refused:
(a) the applicant complies with
subsection 89(3); and
(b) the applicant asks the
Commissioner in writing to publish a notice in the Official Journal that
the application is open to public inspection; and
(c) the
application is not already open to public inspection;
the Commissioner must publish a notice in the Official
Journal stating that a copy of the application is open to public
inspection.
(2) Where:
(a) a PCT application that has not
lapsed, or been withdrawn or refused, is to be treated as an application for a
standard patent under this Act; and
(b) the applicant complies with
subsection 89(3); and
(c) the period of 18 months after the
priority date of the application has ended; and
(d) the
application is not already open to public inspection;
the Commissioner must publish a notice in the Official
Journal stating that a copy of the application is open to public
inspection.
(3) Where:
(a) a
copy of a PCT application, as published under Article 21 of the PCT, is
received in the Patent Office; and
(b) the application has not lapsed, or
been withdrawn or refused; and
(c) a
notice has not been published under subsection (1) or (2);
the Commissioner must publish a notice in the Official
Journal specifying the date on which the copy was so received and stating
that the copy is open to public inspection.
(4) Where a notice is published in the Official
Journal under this section, a copy of the relevant application and of any
other prescribed document is open to public inspection.
93
Evidence of matters arising under PCT
A certificate signed by the Commissioner
in relation to an international application, certifying that:
(a) any matter or thing required or
permitted by or under this Act or the PCT to be made or done has been made or
done; or
(b) any
matter or thing required by or under this Act or the PCT not to be made or done
has not been made or done;
is prima facie evidence of the matters contained in
the certificate.
Part 2—Convention applications
94
Convention applicants may make Convention applications
(1) A Convention applicant in relation to a
basic application may make a Convention application, or 2 or more such
applicants may make a joint Convention application, within the prescribed
period.
(2) Where 2 or more basic applications for
protection in respect of inventions have been made in one or more Convention
countries, one Convention application may be made within the prescribed period
by a Convention applicant in relation to those basic applications, or by 2 or
more such entitled applicants jointly, in respect of the inventions disclosed
in the basic applications.
95
Manner of making Convention application
(1) Subject to this section, a Convention
application must be made and dealt with in the same way as any other patent
application.
(2) A patent request relating to a Convention
application must:
(a) include the prescribed particulars
relating to the relevant basic application; and
(b) be accompanied by a complete
specification.
(3) In addition to the complete specification,
the prescribed documents must be filed within the prescribed period.
96
Withdrawn, abandoned or refused applications
(1) Where, at the time when a Convention
application is made in respect of an invention:
(a) an application has been made for
protection in respect of the invention in a Convention country; and
(b) the application has been
withdrawn, abandoned or refused without becoming open to public inspection; and
(c) the application has not been used
as the basis of claiming a right of priority in a Convention country under a
law of that country corresponding to this Part; and
(d) a
later application has been made by the same applicant for protection in respect
of the invention in the Convention country in which the earlier application was
made;
the applicant may ask the Commissioner to disregard the
earlier application for the purposes of this Part.
(2) Where an applicant makes a request under subsection (1):
(a) the earlier application must be
disregarded; and
(b) neither the applicant nor any
other applicant may use the earlier application as a basic application for the
purposes of this Part.
Chapter 9—Re‑examination of standard patents
96A
Chapter does not apply to innovation patents
This Chapter does not apply in relation
to innovation patents.
97 Re‑examination
of complete specifications
(1) Subject to this section and the
regulations, if:
(a) a request and complete
specification relating to an application for a patent has been accepted; and
(b) the patent has not been granted;
the Commissioner may re‑examine the complete
specification.
(2) Subject to this section and the
regulations, where a patent has been granted, the Commissioner may, and must if
asked to do so by the patentee or any other person, re‑examine the complete
specification.
(3) Where the validity of a patent is
disputed in any proceedings before a prescribed court under this Act, the court
may direct the Commissioner to re‑examine the complete specification and the
Commissioner must re‑examine the specification accordingly.
(4) Where relevant proceedings in relation to
a patent are pending, the Commissioner must not re‑examine the complete
specification relating to the patent under subsection (2).
(5) Where:
(a) the Commissioner has started to re‑examine
a complete specification relating to a patent under subsection (2); and
(b) relevant
proceedings in relation to the patent are started;
the Commissioner must not continue the re‑examination.
98
Report on re‑examination
(1) On re‑examining a complete specification,
the Commissioner must ascertain and report whether, to the best of his or her
knowledge, the invention, so far as claimed in any claim and when compared with
the prior art base as it existed before the priority date of that claim:
(a) is not novel; and
(b) does not involve an inventive
step.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1),
the prior art base is to be taken not to include information made publicly
available only through the doing of an act (whether in or out of the patent
area).
[Note: see also section 7.]
99
Statement by applicant or patentee
(1) Where the Commissioner reports adversely
on a complete specification, the applicant or patentee may, within the
prescribed period, file a statement, in accordance with the regulations,
disputing the whole or any part of the report.
(2) The applicant or patentee may file a
statement whether or not the applicant or patentee takes steps to amend the
complete specification, or files a statement of amendments in accordance with a
direction under section 106 or 107.
100
Copies of report to be given to court
A copy of a report under section 98,
and of any statement filed under section 99 in relation to the report,
must, where the re‑examination was directed under subsection 97(3), be given to
the court that gave the direction.
100A
Refusal to grant patent—re‑examination before grant
(1) Where the Commissioner makes an adverse
report on a re‑examination under subsection 97(1), the Commissioner may refuse
to grant the patent (see subsection 61(1)).
(2) The
Commissioner cannot refuse to grant a patent under this section unless the
Commissioner:
(a) has given the applicant a
reasonable opportunity to be heard; and
(b) has, where appropriate, given the
applicant a reasonable opportunity to amend the relevant specification for the
purpose of removing any lawful ground of objection and the applicant has failed
to do so.
(3) The applicant may appeal to the Federal
Court against a decision of the Commissioner under this section.
101
Revocation of patent—re‑examination after grant
(1) Where the Commissioner makes an adverse
report on a re‑examination under subsection 97(2), the Commissioner may, by
notice in writing, revoke the patent, either wholly or so far as it relates to
a particular claim, as the case requires.
(2) The Commissioner must not revoke a patent
under this section unless the Commissioner:
(a) has given the patentee a
reasonable opportunity to be heard; and
(b) has, where appropriate, given the
patentee a reasonable opportunity to amend the relevant specification for the
purpose of removing any lawful ground of objection and the patentee has failed
to do so.
(3) The Commissioner must not revoke a patent
under this section while relevant proceedings in relation to that patent are
pending.
(4) The patentee may appeal to the Federal
Court against a decision of the Commissioner under this section.
Chapter 9A—Examination, re‑examination and opposition‑innovation
patents
Part 1—Examination of innovation patents
101A
Examination may be requested or Commissioner may decide to examine
After the grant of an innovation patent,
the Commissioner:
(a) may, if the Commissioner decides
to do so; and
(b) must, if asked to do so, in
writing, by the patentee or any other person;
examine the complete specification relating to an
innovation patent.
101B
Examination of an innovation patent
What the Commissioner must do in examining a patent
(1) If the Commissioner examines an
innovation patent under section 101A, the Commissioner must:
(a) examine the complete specification
relating to the patent to determine if the patent is invalid and should be
revoked because a ground set out in subsection (2), (4), (5), (6) or (7)
is made out; and
(b) report on the grounds set out in
those subsections.
These are the only grounds for revocation under this
section.
Grounds for revocation relating to validity
(2) The grounds for revocation under subsection (1)
include the following:
(a) that the specification does not
comply with section 40;
(b) that the invention, so far as
claimed, does not comply with paragraph 18(1A)(a) or (b);
(c) that the invention is not a
patentable invention under subsection 18(2) or (3);
(d) that the use of the invention
would be contrary to law.
(3) For the purposes of working out whether
the invention does not comply with paragraph 18(1A)(b), the prior art base
(referred to in that paragraph) is to be taken not to include information made
publicly available only through the doing of an act (whether in or out of the
patent area).
Revocation on ground that invention claims a substance
capable of being used as food or medicine etc.
(4) A further ground for revocation is that
the patent claims as an invention:
(a) a substance that is capable of
being used as food or medicine (whether for human beings or animals and whether
for internal or external use) and is a mere mixture of known ingredients; or
(b) a process producing such a
substance by mere admixture.
Revocation on ground that patent includes a name
(5) A further ground for revocation is that
the patent contains a claim that includes the name of a person as the name, or
part of the name, of the invention so far as it is claimed in that claim.
Revocation on grounds of multiple patents for one
invention
(6) A further ground for revocation is that:
(a) the innovation patent claims an
invention that is the same as an invention that is the subject of a patent and
is made by the same inventor; and
(b) the relevant claim or claims in
respect of each patent have the same priority date or dates.
Revocation for grounds set out in the regulations
(7) A further ground for revocation is that
the complete specification does not comply with such other matters (if any) as
are prescribed.
101C
How and when examination to be carried out
The examination under section 101B
must be carried out:
(a) in accordance with the
regulations; and
(b) within the period prescribed.
101D
Commissioner to be given information on searches
(1) The patentee must inform the
Commissioner, in accordance with the regulations, of the results of the
following searches carried out for the purpose of assessing the patentability
of an invention disclosed in the complete specification or a corresponding
application filed outside Australia:
(a) any documentary searches by, or on
behalf of, a foreign patent office, other than searches prescribed by the
regulations;
(b) the documentary searches
prescribed by the regulations.
(2) Subsection (1) only applies to
searches completed before the issue of a certificate of examination in respect
of the patent.
(3) In subsection (2):
completed, in relation to a search, has the
meaning prescribed by the regulations.
101E
Certificate of examination
If:
(a) after examining a patent under
section 101B, the Commissioner decides in writing that he or she is
satisfied that the invention, so far as claimed, complies with paragraph
18(1A)(b); and
(aa) after so examining the patent, the
Commissioner also decides in writing that he or she considers that:
(i) a ground for the revocation
of the patent (other than a ground in respect of paragraph 18(1A)(b)) has not
been made out; or
(ii) any such ground has
been removed; and
(b) the
patent has not ceased under section 143A;
the Commissioner must:
(c) notify the patentee and
the person who requested the examination (if that person is not the patentee)
that the patent has been examined and that a certificate of
examination is to be issued; and
(d) publish a notice of the
examination having occurred in the Official Journal; and
(e) issue a certificate of examination
to the patentee in the form approved by the Commissioner; and
(f) register the issue of the
certificate.
101F
Revocation of innovation patents following examination under section 101B
(1) If:
(a) the Commissioner considers that,
after examining a patent under section 101B, a ground for the revocation
of a patent has been made out and that the ground has not been removed; and
(b) the patent has not ceased under
section 143A;
the Commissioner must revoke the patent.
(2) If the Commissioner revokes the patent:
(a) the Commissioner must notify the
patentee and the person who requested the examination (if that person is not
the patentee) of the revocation; and
(b) register the revocation of the
patent.
(3) The Commissioner
must not revoke a patent under this section unless the Commissioner:
(a) has given the patentee a
reasonable opportunity to be heard; and
(b) has, if appropriate, given the
patentee a reasonable opportunity to amend the relevant specification for the
purposes of removing a ground for the revocation of the patent and the patentee
has failed to do so.
(4) An appeal lies to the Federal Court
against a decision of the Commissioner revoking a patent.
Part 2—Re‑examination of innovation patents
101G
Re‑examination of complete specifications of innovation patents
(1) Subject to subsections 101K(2) and (3)
and the regulations, after an innovation patent has been certified, the
Commissioner:
(a) may, if the Commissioner decides
to do so; and
(b) must, if asked to do so, in
writing, by the patentee or any other person;
re‑examine the complete specification relating to the
patent.
(2) If the Commissioner re‑examines an
innovation patent under subsection (1):
(a) the Commissioner must re‑examine
the complete specification relating to the patent to determine if the patent is
invalid and should be revoked because a ground set out in subsection (3)
is made out; and
(b) the Commissioner must report on
the grounds set out in subsection (3).
(3) The grounds for the revocation of the
patent under subsection (2) are whether the invention, so far as claimed
in any claim and when compared with the prior art base as it existed before the
priority date of that claim:
(a) is not novel; and
(b) does not involve an innovative
step.
(4) There are no other grounds for the
revocation of a patent under subsection (2).
(5) For the purposes of subsection (3),
the prior art base is to be taken not to include information made publicly
available only through the doing of an act (whether in or out of the patent
area).
101H
Patentee statements
(1) If the Commissioner reports that, after
re‑examining a patent under section 101G, a ground for the revocation of
the patent has been made out, the patentee may, within the prescribed period,
file a statement, in accordance with the regulations, disputing the whole or
any part of the report.
(2) The patentee may file a statement whether
or not the patentee takes steps to amend the complete specification, or files a
statement of amendments in accordance with a direction under section 106.
101J
Revocation of innovation patent following re‑examination
(1) If the Commissioner makes an adverse
report on a re‑examination under section 101G, the Commissioner may, by
notice in writing, revoke the patent, either wholly or so far as it relates to
a particular claim, as the case requires.
(2) If the Commissioner revokes the patent:
(a) the Commissioner must notify the
patentee and the person who requested the examination (if that person is not
the patentee) of the revocation; and
(b) register the revocation of the
patent.
(3) The Commissioner must not revoke a patent
under this section unless:
(a) the Commissioner has given the
patentee a reasonable opportunity to be heard; and
(b) the Commissioner has considered
the statement made by the patentee under section 101H (if any); and
(c) the Commissioner has, if
appropriate, given the patentee a reasonable opportunity to amend the relevant
specification for the purpose of removing any ground for revocation and the
patentee has failed to do so.
(4) The Commissioner must not revoke a patent
under this section while relevant proceedings in relation to that patent are
pending.
(5) The patentee may appeal to the Federal
Court against a decision of the Commissioner under this section.
101K
Relevant proceedings and re‑examination
(1) If the validity of an innovation patent
is disputed in any proceedings before a prescribed court under this Act, the
court may direct the Commissioner to re‑examine the complete specification
relating to the patent. If so directed, the Commissioner must re‑examine the
specification accordingly.
(2) If relevant proceedings in relation to an
innovation patent are pending, the Commissioner must not re‑examine the complete
specification relating to the patent.
(3) If:
(a) the Commissioner has started to re‑examine
a complete specification relating to an innovation patent; and
(b) relevant proceedings in relation
to the patent are started;
the Commissioner must not continue the re‑examination.
101L
Copies of report to be given to court
A copy of a report under paragraph
101G(2)(b), and of any statement filed under section 101H in relation to
the report, must, if the re‑examination was directed under subsection 101K(1),
be given to the court that gave the direction.
Part 3—Opposition to innovation patents
101M
Opposition to innovation patent
The Minister, or any other person, may,
in accordance with the regulations, oppose an innovation patent that has been certified
and seek the revocation of it, on one or more of the following grounds of
invalidity, but on no other:
(a) that the patentee is either:
(i) not entitled to the
patent; or
(ii) entitled to the patent
but only in conjunction with some other person;
(b) that the invention is not a
patentable invention because it does not comply with paragraph 18(1A)(a) or
(b);
(c) that the invention is not a
patentable invention under subsection 18(2) or (3);
(d) that the complete specification
does not comply with subsection 40(2) or (3).
101N
Hearing and decision by the Commissioner
(1) If an innovation patent has been opposed
under section 101M, the Commissioner must decide the case in accordance
with the regulations.
(2) The Commissioner must give the opponent
and the patentee a reasonable opportunity to be heard before deciding the case.
(3) The Commissioner may, in deciding whether
to revoke the patent, take into account any ground on which the grant of an
innovation patent may be opposed, whether relied upon by the opponent or not.
(4) Subject to subsection (6), if the
Commissioner is satisfied that a ground exists for the revocation of an
innovation patent, the Commissioner may revoke the patent in writing either
wholly or so far as it relates to a particular claim.
(5) If the
Commissioner revokes the patent:
(a) the Commissioner must notify the
patentee and the opponent of the revocation; and
(b) register the revocation of the
patent.
(6) The Commissioner must not revoke a patent
under this section unless the Commissioner has, where appropriate, given the
patentee a reasonable opportunity to amend the relevant specification for the
purpose of removing any ground for revocation and the patentee has failed to do
so.
(7) The patentee, and any opponent, may
appeal to the Federal Court against a decision of the Commissioner under this
section.
101P
Relevant proceedings and opposition
If relevant proceedings in relation to
an innovation patent are pending, the Commissioner must not make a decision
under this Part in relation to the patent without the leave of the court.
Chapter 10—Amendments
Part 1—Amendments that are not allowable
102
What amendments are not allowable?
Amendment of complete specification not allowable if
amended specification would claim matter not in substance disclosed in the
filed specification
(1) An amendment of a complete specification
is not allowable if, as a result of the amendment, the specification would
claim matter not in substance disclosed in the specification as filed.
Certain amendments of complete specification are not
allowable after relevant time
(2) An amendment of a complete specification
is not allowable after the relevant time if, as a result of the amendment:
(a) a claim of the specification would
not in substance fall within the scope of the claims of the specification
before amendment; or
(b) the specification would not comply
with subsection 40(2) or (3).
Meaning of relevant time
(2A) For the purposes of subsection (2), relevant
time means:
(a) in relation to an amendment
proposed to a complete specification relating to a standard patent—after the
specification has been accepted; or
(b) in relation to an amendment
proposed to a complete specification relating to an innovation patent—after the
Commissioner has made decisions under paragraphs 101E(a) and (aa) in respect of
the patent.
Amendment of innovation patent request not allowable in
certain circumstances
(2B) An amendment to a patent request relating
to an innovation patent application is not allowable if:
(a) the patent application was
provided for in section 79C; and
(b) the effect of the proposed
amendment would be to convert the application from an application for an
innovation patent to an application for a standard patent.
Amendments not allowable if information not provided
(2C) An amendment of a complete specification
relating to a patent is not allowable if:
(a) the patentee or the patentee’s
predecessor in title failed to ensure the provision to the Commissioner of the
information required by subsection 45(3) or section 101D in relation to
the patent; and
(b) the effect of the proposed
amendment would be to remove a lawful ground of objection under paragraph
18(1)(b) or 18(1A)(b) to the specification arising from the existence of some
or all of the information not provided.
(3) This section does not apply to an
amendment for the purpose of correcting a clerical error or an obvious mistake
made in, or in relation to, a complete specification.
103
Consent of mortgagee or exclusive licensee needed
(1) Where a person is registered as the
mortgagee or exclusive licensee of a patent, an amendment of the complete
specification is not allowable unless the mortgagee or licensee has consented,
in writing, to the amendment.
(2) If a mortgagee or licensee refuses to
consent to a proposed amendment, the Commissioner may, on the application of
the applicant or patentee, if satisfied that the consent has been unreasonably
refused, direct that the consent of the mortgagee or licensee is not necessary.
Part 2—Amendments of patent requests, specifications and other
filed documents
104
Amendments by applicants and patentees
(1) An applicant for a patent or a patentee,
may, subject to this Act, and subject to and in accordance with the regulations,
ask the Commissioner for leave to amend the relevant patent request or complete
specification, or any other filed document, for any purpose including either or
both of the following:
(a) removing a lawful ground of
objection to the request or specification, whether that objection is raised in
the course of an examination or re‑examination or otherwise;
(b) correcting a clerical error or an
obvious mistake.
(2) Where an applicant or patentee asks for
leave to amend a patent request or complete specification, or any other filed
document, the Commissioner must consider and deal with the request in
accordance with the regulations.
(4) The Minister or any other person may,
subject to and in accordance with the regulations, oppose allowing an
amendment.
(5) The Commissioner must not allow an
amendment that is not allowable under section 102.
(6) On the allowance of an amendment, the
amendment is to be taken to have been made.
(7) An appeal lies to the Federal Court,
against a decision of the Commissioner allowing, or refusing to allow, a
requested amendment, other than a prescribed decision.
105
Amendments directed by court
(1) In any
relevant proceedings in relation to a patent, the court may, on the application
of the patentee, by order direct the amendment of the patent, the patent
request or the complete specification in the manner specified in the order.
(2) An order may be made subject to such
terms (if any) as to costs, advertisements or otherwise, as the court thinks
fit.
(3) The patentee must give notice of an
application for an order to the Commissioner, who is entitled to appear and be
heard, and must appear if the court directs.
(4) A court is not to direct an amendment
that is not allowable under section 102.
(5) The patentee must file a copy of an order
within the prescribed period.
(6) On the filing of a copy of an order, the
patent, patent request or complete specification is to be taken to have been
amended in the manner specified in the order.
106
Amendments directed by Commissioner: patents
(1) Where:
(a) a patent has been granted; and
(b) the Commissioner is satisfied that
the patent is invalid on grounds that could be removed by appropriate
amendments of the specification following:
(i) in the case of a
standard patent—re‑examination of the patent; or
(ii) in the case of an
innovation patent—examination of, re‑examination of, or opposition to, the
patent;
the Commissioner may, in accordance with the regulations,
direct the patentee to file, within such time as the Commissioner allows, a
statement of proposed amendments of the specification for the purpose of
removing those grounds.
(2) The Commissioner must not give a
direction without first giving the patentee a reasonable opportunity to be
heard.
(3) A patentee may, in accordance with the
regulations, amend a statement of amendments.
(4) If the Commissioner is satisfied that the
amendments set out in a statement (or an amended statement) are allowable and
would, if made, remove the grounds on which the patent is invalid, the
Commissioner must allow the amendments.
(5) On the allowance of an amendment, the
amendment is to be taken to have been made.
107
Amendments directed by Commissioner: applications for standard patents
(1) Where:
(a) a complete application for a standard
patent has been made; and
(b) the Commissioner is satisfied that
there are lawful grounds of objection to the patent request or complete
specification, but that those grounds of objection could be removed by
appropriate amendments of the request or specification; and
(c) the
applicant has not taken action to amend the request or specification so as to
remove those grounds of objection;
the Commissioner may, in accordance with the regulations,
direct the applicant to file, within such time as the Commissioner allows, a
statement of proposed amendments of the request or specification for the
purpose of removing those grounds of objection.
(2) The Commissioner must not give a
direction without first giving the applicant a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
(3) An applicant may, in accordance with the
regulations, amend a statement of amendments.
(4) If the Commissioner is satisfied that the
amendments set out in a statement (or an amended statement) are allowable and
would, if made, remove all lawful grounds of objection to the patent request
and complete specification, the Commissioner must allow the amendments.
(5) On the allowance of an amendment, the
amendment is to be taken to have been made.
109
Appeal
An appeal lies to the Federal Court against
a direction of the Commissioner under section 106 or 107.
Part 3—Miscellaneous
110
Advertisement of amendment of complete specification
An amendment of a complete specification
that is open to public inspection must be notified in the Official Journal.
112
Pending proceedings
A complete specification relating to a
patent must not be amended, except under section 105, while relevant
proceedings in relation to the patent are pending.
113
Persons claiming under assignment or agreement
(1) Where, before a patent is granted, a
person would, if the patent were then granted, be entitled under an assignment
or agreement, or by operation of law, to:
(a) the patent or an interest in it;
or
(b) an
undivided share in the patent or in such an interest;
the Commissioner may, on a request made by the person in
accordance with the regulations, direct that the application proceed in the
name of the person, or in the name of the person and the applicant or the other
joint applicant or applicants, as the case requires.
(2) Where the Commissioner gives a direction:
(a) the person is to be taken to be
the applicant, or a joint applicant, as the case requires; and
(b) the patent request is to be taken
to have been amended so as to request the grant of a patent to the person,
either alone or as a joint patentee, as the case requires.
114
Priority date of certain amended claims
(1) Where a claim of a complete specification
claims matter that was in substance disclosed as a result of amending the
specification, the priority date of the claim must be determined under the
regulations.
114A
Objection cannot be taken to certain amended claims
(1) This section applies if:
(a) a complete specification (the original
specification) has been amended; and
(b) after the amendment, the amended
specification claims matter that was in substance disclosed as a result of the
amendment; and
(c) after the filing date of the
original specification there is a publication or use of the invention as
described in the original specification.
(2) If this section applies, objection cannot
be taken to the amended specification, and a patent is not invalid, on the
ground that the invention, so far as claimed in the amended specification and
having regard to the publication or the use of the invention described in the
original specification, does not involve:
(a) in the case of a standard
patent—an inventive step; or
(b) in the case of an innovation
patent—an innovative step.
115
Restriction on recovery of damages etc.
(1) Where a complete specification is amended
after becoming open to public inspection, damages shall not be awarded, and an
order shall not be made for an account of profits, in respect of any
infringement of the patent before the date of the decision or order allowing or
directing the amendment:
(a) unless the court is satisfied that
the specification without the amendment was framed in good faith and with
reasonable skill and knowledge; or
(b) if the claim of the specification
that was infringed is a claim mentioned under subsection 114(1).
(2) Subsection (1) has effect subject to
subsections 57(3) and (4).
116
Interpretation of amended specifications
The Commissioner or a court may, in
interpreting a complete specification as amended, refer to the specification without
amendment.
Chapter 11—Infringement
Part 1—Infringement and infringement proceedings
117
Infringement by supply of products
(1) If the use of a product by a person would
infringe a patent, the supply of that product by one person to another is an
infringement of the patent by the supplier unless the supplier is the patentee
or licensee of the patent.
(2) A reference in subsection (1) to the
use of a product by a person is a reference to:
(a) if the product is capable of only
one reasonable use, having regard to its nature or design—that use; or
(b) if the product is not a staple
commercial product—any use of the product, if the supplier had reason to
believe that the person would put it to that use; or
(c) in any case—the use of the product
in accordance with any instructions for the use of the product, or any
inducement to use the product, given to the person by the supplier or contained
in an advertisement published by or with the authority of the supplier.
118
Infringement exemptions: use in or on foreign vessels, aircraft or vehicles
The rights of a patentee are not
infringed:
(a) by using the patented invention on
board a foreign vessel, in the body of the vessel, or in the machinery, tackle,
apparatus or other accessories of the vessel, if the vessel comes into the
patent area only temporarily or accidentally and the invention is used
exclusively for the needs of the vessel; or
(b) by using the patented invention in
the construction or working of a foreign aircraft or foreign land vehicle, or
in the accessories of the aircraft or vehicle, if the aircraft or vehicle comes
into the patent area only temporarily or accidentally.
119
Infringement exemptions: prior use
(1) A person may, without infringing a
patent, do an act that exploits a product, method or process and would infringe
the patent apart from this subsection, if immediately before the priority date
of the relevant claim the person:
(a) was exploiting the product, method
or process in the patent area; or
(b) had taken definite steps
(contractually or otherwise) to exploit the product, method or process in the
patent area.
Note 1: This section applies in relation to a patent
granted as a result of an application filed on or after the commencement of
Schedule 6 to the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Act 2006
(which repealed and substituted this section).
Note 2: Section 119 of this Act as in force before
the commencement of that Schedule continues to apply in relation to patents
granted as a result of earlier applications.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if,
before the priority date, the person:
(a) had stopped (except temporarily)
exploiting the product, method or process in the patent area; or
(b) had abandoned (except temporarily)
the steps to exploit the product, method or process in the patent area.
Limit for product, method or process derived from
patentee
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to a
product, method or process the person derived from the patentee or the
patentee’s predecessor in title in the patented invention unless the person
derived the product, method or process from information that was made publicly
available:
(a) by or with the consent of the
patentee or the patentee’s predecessor in title; and
(b) through any publication or use of
the invention in the prescribed circumstances mentioned in paragraph 24(1)(a).
Exemption for successors in title
(4) A person (the disposer) may
dispose of the whole of the disposer’s entitlement under subsection (1) to
do an act without infringing a patent to another person (the recipient).
If the disposer does so, this section applies in relation to the recipient as
if the references in subsections (1), (2) and (3) to the person were
references to:
(a) the disposer; or
(b) if the disposer’s entitlement
arose because of one or more previous applications of this subsection—the first
person:
(i) who was entitled under
subsection (1) (applying of its own force) to do an act without infringing
the patent; and
(ii) to whom the disposer’s
entitlement is directly or indirectly attributable.
Definition
(5) In this section:
exploit includes:
(a) in relation to a product:
(i) make, hire, sell or
otherwise dispose of the product; and
(ii) offer to make, hire,
sell or otherwise dispose of the product; and
(iii) use or import the
product; and
(iv) keep the product for
the purpose of doing an act described in subparagraph (i), (ii) or (iii);
and
(b) in relation to a method or
process:
(i) use the method or
process; and
(ii) do an act described in
subparagraph (a)(i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) with a product resulting from the
use of the method or process.
119A
Infringement exemptions: acts for obtaining regulatory approval of
pharmaceuticals
(1) The rights of a patentee of a
pharmaceutical patent are not infringed by a person exploiting an invention
claimed in the patent if the exploitation is solely for:
(a) purposes connected with obtaining
the inclusion in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods of goods that:
(i) are intended for
therapeutic use; and
(ii) are not medical
devices, or therapeutic devices, as defined in the Therapeutic Goods Act
1989; or
(b) purposes connected with obtaining
similar regulatory approval under a law of a foreign country or of a part of a
foreign country.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to the
export from Australia of goods for purposes described in paragraph (1)(b)
unless the term of the patent has been extended under Part 3 of
Chapter 6 and the goods consist of or contain:
(a) a pharmaceutical substance per
se that is in substance disclosed in the complete specification of the
patent and in substance falls within the scope of the claim or claims of that
specification; or
(b) a pharmaceutical substance when
produced by a process that involves the use of recombinant DNA technology, that
is in substance disclosed in the complete specification of the patent and in
substance falls within the scope of the claim or claims of that specification.
Note: Part 3 of Chapter 6 provides for the
extension of the term of standard patents claiming pharmaceutical substances.
(3) In this section:
pharmaceutical patent means a patent
claiming:
(a) a pharmaceutical substance; or
(b) a method, use or product relating
to a pharmaceutical substance, including any of the following:
(i) a method for producing
a raw material needed to produce the substance;
(ii) a product that is a
raw material needed to produce the substance;
(iii) a product that is a
pro‑drug, metabolite or derivative of the substance.
120
Infringement proceedings
(1) Subject to
subsection (1A), infringement proceedings may be started in a prescribed
court, or in another court having jurisdiction to hear and determine the
matter, by the patentee or an exclusive licensee.
(1A) Infringement proceedings in respect of an
innovation patent cannot be started unless the patent has been certified.
(2) If an exclusive licensee starts
infringement proceedings, the patentee must be joined as a defendant unless
joined as a plaintiff.
(3) A patentee joined as a defendant is not
liable for costs unless the patentee enters an appearance and takes part in the
proceedings.
(4) Infringement proceedings must be started
within:
(a) 3 years from the day on which the
relevant patent is granted; or
(b) 6
years from the day on which the infringing act was done;
whichever period ends later.
121
Counter‑claim for revocation of patent
(1) A defendant in infringement proceedings
may apply by way of counter‑claim in the proceedings for the revocation of the
patent.
(2) The provisions of this Act relating to proceedings
for the revocation of a patent apply, with the necessary changes, to a counter‑claim.
121A
Burden of proof—infringement of patent for a process
(1) This section applies only to a patent for
a process for obtaining a product.
(2) If, in proceedings for infringement of a
patent started by the patentee or the exclusive licensee:
(a) the defendant alleges that he or
she has used a process different from the patented process to obtain a product
(defendant’s product) identical to the product obtained by the
patented process; and
(b) the
court is satisfied that:
(i) it is very likely that
the defendant’s product was made by the patented process; and
(ii) the
patentee or exclusive licensee has taken reasonable steps to find out the
process actually used by the defendant but has not been able to do so;
then, in the absence of proof to
the contrary the onus for which is on the defendant, the defendant’s product is
to be taken to have been obtained by the patented process.
(3) In deciding how the defendant is to
adduce evidence for the purposes of subsection (2), the court is to take
into account the defendant’s legitimate interests in having business and
manufacturing secrets protected.
122
Relief for infringement of patent
(1) The relief which a court may grant for
infringement of a patent includes an injunction (subject to such terms, if any,
as the court thinks fit) and, at the option of the plaintiff, either damages or
an account of profits.
(1A) A court may include an additional amount in
an assessment of damages for an infringement of a patent, if the court
considers it appropriate to do so having regard to:
(a) the flagrancy of the infringement;
and
(b) the need to deter similar
infringements of patents; and
(c) the conduct of the party that
infringed the patent that occurred:
(i) after the act
constituting the infringement; or
(ii) after that party was
informed that it had allegedly infringed the patent; and
(d) any benefit shown to have accrued
to that party because of the infringement; and
(e) all other relevant matters.
(2) On the application of either party, the
court may make such order for the inspection of any thing in or on any vehicle,
vessel, aircraft or premises, and may impose such terms and give such
directions about the inspection, as the court thinks fit.
123
Innocent infringement
(1) A court may refuse to award damages, or
to make an order for an account of profits, in respect of an infringement of a
patent if the defendant satisfies the court that, at the date of the infringement,
the defendant was not aware, and had no reason to believe, that a patent for
the invention existed.
(2) If
patented products, marked so as to indicate that they are patented in Australia, were sold or used in the patent area to a substantial extent before the date of
the infringement, the defendant is to be taken to have been aware of the
existence of the patent unless the contrary is established.
(3) Nothing in this section affects a court’s
power to grant relief by way of an injunction.
Part 2—Non‑infringement declarations
124
Interpretation
In this Part:
patentee includes an exclusive licensee.
125
Application for non‑infringement declaration
(1) A person who wishes to exploit an
invention may apply to a prescribed court for a declaration that the
exploitation of the invention would not infringe a claim of a particular
complete specification.
(2) An application may be made:
(a) at any time after the complete
specification has become open to public inspection; and
(b) whether or not the nominated
person or patentee has made any assertion to the effect that the exploitation
of the invention would infringe the claim.
(3) The nominated person or patentee must be
joined as a respondent in the proceedings.
126
Proceedings for non‑infringement declarations
(1) A prescribed court must not make a non‑infringement
declaration unless a patent has been granted in respect of the relevant
invention and:
(a) the applicant for the declaration:
(i) has asked the
nominated person or patentee in writing for a written admission that the
proposed exploitation would not infringe a claim of the complete specification;
and
(ii) has given the
nominated person or patentee full written particulars of the proposed
exploitation; and
(iii) has
undertaken to pay a reasonable sum for the nominated person’s or patentee’s
expenses in obtaining advice about whether the proposed exploitation would
infringe the claim; and
(b) the nominated person or patentee
has refused or failed to make the admission; and
(c) if the patent is an innovation
patent—the patent has been certified.
(2) The validity of a claim cannot be
questioned in proceedings for a non‑infringement declaration.
(3) The costs of all parties in proceedings
for a non‑infringement declaration must be paid by the applicant for the
declaration unless the court otherwise orders.
127
Effect of non‑infringement declarations
If:
(a) a nominated person or patentee has
given a person a written admission that the exploitation of an invention would
not infringe a claim, or a prescribed court has made a non‑infringement
declaration in respect of an invention; and
(b) the
patentee later gets an injunction restraining the person from exploiting the
invention as specified in the admission, or the declaration is revoked;
the person is not liable:
(c) to account to the patentee for any
profits, made by the person before the date on which the injunction was granted
or the declaration was revoked, from the exploitation of the invention as
specified in the admission or declaration; or
(d) to pay damages for any loss
suffered by the patentee before that date as a result of that exploitation.
Part 3—Unjustified threats of infringement proceedings
128
Application for relief from unjustified threats
(1) Where a person, by means of circulars,
advertisements or otherwise, threatens a person with infringement proceedings,
or other similar proceedings, a person aggrieved may apply to a prescribed
court, or to another court having jurisdiction to hear and determine the
application, for:
(a) a declaration that the threats are
unjustifiable; and
(b) an injunction against the
continuance of the threats; and
(c) the recovery of any damages
sustained by the applicant as a result of the threats.
(2) Subsection (1) applies whether or
not the person who made the threats is entitled to, or interested in, the
patent or a patent application.
129
Court’s power to grant relief if threats related to a standard patent or
standard patent application
If an application under section 128
for relief relates to threats made in respect of a standard patent or an
application for a standard patent, the court may grant the applicant the relief
applied for unless the respondent satisfies the court that the acts about which
the threats were made infringed, or would infringe:
(a) a claim that is not shown by the
applicant to be invalid; or
(b) rights under section 57 in
respect of a claim that is not shown by the applicant to be a claim that would
be invalid if the patent had been granted.
129A
Threats related to an innovation patent application or innovation patent and
court’s power to grant relief
Certain threats of infringement proceedings are always
unjustifiable
(1) If:
(a) a
person:
(i) has
applied for an innovation patent, but the application has not been determined;
or
(ii) has an innovation
patent that has not been certified; and
(b) the person, by means of circulars,
advertisements or otherwise, threatens a person with infringement proceedings
or other similar proceedings in respect of the patent applied for, or the
patent, as the case may be;
then, for the purposes of an application for relief under
section 128 by the person threatened, the threats are unjustifiable.
Courts power to grant relief in respect of threats made
by the applicant for an innovation patent or the patentee of an uncertified
innovation patent
(2) If an application under section 128
for relief relates to threats made in respect of an innovation patent that has
not been certified or an application for an innovation patent, the court may
grant the applicant the relief applied for.
Courts power to grant relief in respect of threats made
by the patentee of a certified innovation patent
(3) If an application under section 128
for relief relates to threats made in respect of a certified innovation patent,
the court may grant the applicant the relief applied for unless the respondent
satisfies the court that the acts about which the threats were made infringed,
or would infringe, a claim that is not shown by the applicant to be invalid.
130
Counter‑claim for infringement
(1) The
respondent in proceedings under section 128 may apply, by way of
counter‑claim, for relief to which the respondent would be entitled in separate
proceedings for an infringement by the applicant of the patent to which the
threats relate.
(2) Where the respondent applies by way of
counter‑claim, the applicant may, without making a separate application under
Chapter 12, apply in the proceedings for the revocation of the patent.
(3) The provisions of this Act relating to
infringement proceedings apply, with the necessary changes, to a counter‑claim.
Note: Infringement proceedings cannot be commenced
in respect of an innovation patent unless the patent has first been certified
(see subsection 120(1A)).
(4) The provisions of this Act relating to
proceedings under section 138 for the revocation of a patent apply, with
the necessary changes, to an application under subsection (2).
Note: Revocation proceedings under section 138
cannot be commenced in respect of an innovation patent unless the patent has
first been certified (see subsection 138(1A)).
131
Notification of patent not a threat
The mere notification of the existence
of a patent, or an application for a patent, does not constitute a threat of
proceedings for the purposes of section 128.
132
Liability of legal practitioner or patent attorney
A legal practitioner or a registered
patent attorney is not liable to proceedings under section 128 in respect
of an act done in his or her professional capacity on behalf of a client.
Chapter 12—Compulsory licences and revocation of patents
133
Compulsory licences
(1) Subject to subsection (1A), a person
may apply to the Federal Court, after the end of the prescribed period, for an
order requiring the patentee to grant the applicant a licence to work the
patented invention.
(1A) A person cannot apply for an order in
respect of an innovation patent unless the patent has been certified.
(2) After hearing the application, the court
may, subject to this section, make the order if satisfied that:
(a) all the following conditions
exist:
(i) the applicant has
tried for a reasonable period, but without success, to obtain from the patentee
an authorisation to work the invention on reasonable terms and conditions;
(ii) the reasonable
requirements of the public with respect to the patented invention have not been
satisfied;
(iii) the patentee has given
no satisfactory reason for failing to exploit the patent; or
(b) the patentee has contravened, or
is contravening, Part IV of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
or an application law (as defined in section 150A of that Act) in
connection with the patent.
(3) An order must direct that the licence:
(a) is not to give the licensee, or a
person authorised by the licensee, the exclusive right to work the patented
invention; and
(b) is
to be assignable only in connection with an enterprise or goodwill in
connection with which the licence is used;
and may direct that the licence is to be granted on any
other terms specified in the order.
(3B) If the
patented invention cannot be worked by the applicant without his or her
infringing another patent:
(a) the court is to make the order
only if the court is further satisfied that the patented invention involves an
important technical advance of considerable economic significance on the
invention (other invention) to which the other patent relates;
and
(b) the court must further order that
the patentee of the other invention:
(i) must grant to the applicant
a licence to work the other invention insofar as is necessary to work the
patented invention; and
(ii) is to be granted, if
he or she so requires, a cross‑licence on reasonable terms to work the patented
invention; and
(c) the court must direct that the
licence granted by the patentee of the other invention may be assigned by the
applicant:
(i) only if he or she
assigns the licence granted in respect of the patented invention; and
(ii) only to the assignee
of that licence.
(4) An order operates, without prejudice to
any other method of enforcement, as if it were embodied in a deed granting a
licence and executed by the patentee and all other necessary parties.
(5) The patentee is to be paid in respect of
a licence granted to the applicant under an order:
(a) such amount as is agreed between
the patentee and the applicant; or
(b) if paragraph (a) does not
apply—such amount as is determined by the Federal Court to be just and
reasonable having regard to the economic value of the licence and the desirability
of discouraging contraventions of Part IV of the Competition and
Consumer Act 2010 or an application law (as defined in section 150A of
that Act).
(6) The patentee or the Federal Court may
revoke the licence if:
(a) the patentee and the licensee are
agreed, or the court on application made by either party finds, that the
circumstances that justified the grant of the licence have ceased to exist and
are unlikely to recur; and
(b) the legitimate interests of the
licensee are not likely to be adversely affected by the revocation.
134
Revocation of patent after grant of compulsory licence
(1) Where a compulsory licence relating to a
patent is granted, an interested person may apply to the Federal Court, after
the end of the prescribed period, for an order revoking the patent.
(2) After hearing the application, the court
may make the order if satisfied that:
(a) both:
(i) the reasonable
requirements of the public with respect to the patented invention have not been
satisfied; and
(ii) the patentee has given
no satisfactory reason for failing to exploit the patent; or
(b) the patentee is contravening
Part IV of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 or an application
law (as defined in section 150A of that Act) in connection with the
patent.
135
Reasonable requirements of the public
(1) For the purposes of sections 133 and
134, the reasonable requirements of the public with respect to a patented
invention are to be taken not to have been satisfied if:
(a) an existing trade or industry in Australia, or the establishment of a new trade or industry in Australia, is unfairly
prejudiced, or the demand in Australia for the patented product, or for a
product resulting from the patented process, is not reasonably met, because of
the patentee’s failure:
(i) to manufacture the
patented product to an adequate extent, and supply it on reasonable terms; or
(ii) to manufacture, to an
adequate extent, a part of the patented product that is necessary for the
efficient working of the product, and supply the part on reasonable terms; or
(iii) to carry on the
patented process to a reasonable extent; or
(iv) to grant licences on
reasonable terms; or
(b) a
trade or industry in Australia is unfairly prejudiced by the conditions
attached by the patentee (whether before or after the commencing day) to the
purchase, hire or use of the patented product, the use or working of the
patented process; or
(c) if the patented invention is not
being worked in Australia on a commercial scale, but is capable of being worked
in Australia.
(2) If, where paragraph (1)(c) applies,
the court is satisfied that the time that has elapsed since the patent was
sealed has, because of the nature of the invention or some other cause, been
insufficient to enable the invention to be worked in Australia on a commercial
scale, the court may adjourn the hearing of the application for the period that
the court thinks sufficient for that purpose.
136
Orders to be consistent with international agreements
An order must not be made under section 133
or 134 that is inconsistent with a treaty between the Commonwealth and a
foreign country.
136A
Dealing with allegation of contravention of application law
Proceedings under section 133 or
134 involving an allegation of contravention of an application law that is a
law of a State must be dealt with as if the law were a law of the Commonwealth.
Note: Those proceedings are in the Federal Court,
which can only exercise the judicial power of the Commonwealth. This section
lets the court deal comprehensively with the proceedings without the need for a
court of the State to determine whether the application law has been
contravened.
137
Revocation on surrender of patent
(1) A patentee may, at any time, by written
notice to the Commissioner, offer to surrender the patent.
(2) The Commissioner must give notice of an
offer in accordance with the regulations.
(3) After hearing all interested persons who
notify the Commissioner in accordance with the regulations of their wish to be
heard, the Commissioner may accept the offer and revoke the patent.
(4) Where relevant proceedings in relation to
a patent are pending, the Commissioner must not accept an offer to surrender
the patent without either the leave of the court or the consent of the parties
to the proceedings.
(5) Where a compulsory licence is in force in
relation to a patent, the Commissioner must not accept an offer to surrender
the patent.
138
Revocation of patents in other circumstances
(1) Subject to subsection (1A), the
Minister or any other person may apply to a prescribed court for an order
revoking a patent.
(1A) A person cannot apply for an order in
respect of an innovation patent unless the patent has been certified.
(2) At the hearing of the application, the
respondent is entitled to begin and give evidence in support of the patent and,
if the applicant gives evidence disputing the validity of the patent, the
respondent is entitled to reply.
(3) After hearing the application, the court
may, by order, revoke the patent, either wholly or so far as it relates to a
claim, on one or more of the following grounds, but on no other ground:
(a) that the patentee is not entitled
to the patent;
(b) that the invention is not a
patentable invention;
(d) that the patent was obtained by
fraud, false suggestion or misrepresentation;
(e) that an amendment of the patent
request or the complete specification was made or obtained by fraud, false
suggestion or misrepresentation;
(f) that the specification does not
comply with subsection 40(2) or (3).
139 Parties
to proceedings
(1) The patentee, and any person claiming an
interest in the patent as exclusive licensee or otherwise, are parties to any
proceedings under section 133, 134 or 138.
(2) In any
proceedings under section 133, 134 or 138:
(a) the
applicant must serve a copy of the application on the Commissioner; and
(b) the
Commissioner may appear and be heard in the proceedings.
140
Commissioner to be given copies of orders
An office copy of an order made under
this Chapter must be served on the Commissioner by the Registrar or other
appropriate officer of the court that made the order.
Chapter 13—Withdrawal and lapsing of applications and ceasing of
patents
141
Withdrawal of applications [see also Table B]
(1) A patent application may be withdrawn at
any time except during a period prescribed for the purposes of this section.
(2) A patent application is to be treated as
having been withdrawn if, and only if, the applicant lodges a written notice of
withdrawal signed by the applicant.
142
Lapsing of applications [see also Table B]
(1) A provisional application for a patent
lapses at the end of the period prescribed for the purpose of section 38
or, if that period is extended, at the end of the period as so extended.
(2) A complete application for a standard
patent lapses if:
(a) the applicant does not ask for an
examination of the patent request and complete specification within the
relevant period prescribed for the purposes of subsection 44(1), (2) or (3), as
the case requires; or
(c) the examination of the patent
request and complete specification has been deferred under section 46 and
the applicant does not ask for an examination within the period prescribed for
the purposes of this paragraph; or
(d) the applicant does not pay a continuation
fee for the application within the period prescribed for the purposes of this
paragraph; or
(e) the patent request and complete
specification are not accepted within the period prescribed for the purposes of
this paragraph.
(3) A complete
application for a standard patent lapses if the applicant does not comply with
a direction of the Commissioner under section 107 within the time allowed
by the Commissioner under that section.
143
Ceasing of patents
A standard patent ceases if the patentee:
(a) does not pay a renewal fee for the
patent within the prescribed period; or
(b) does not file the prescribed
documents (if any) within the prescribed period.
143A
Ceasing of innovation patents
An innovation patent ceases if:
(a) the fee for filing the request and
accompanying specification relating to an application for an innovation patent
is not paid in accordance with the regulations; or
(b) after an examination of the patent
has been requested under paragraph 101A(b), the patentee does not pay the
prescribed fee for the examination within the prescribed period; or
(c) the Commissioner does not make
decisions under paragraphs 101E(a) and (aa) within the period prescribed for
the purposes of this paragraph; or
(d) the patentee does not pay a renewal
fee for the patent within the prescribed period; or
(e) the patentee does not comply with
a direction of the Commissioner under section 106 within the time allowed
by the Commissioner under that section.
143B
Payment of fees
To avoid doubt, a reference in this
Chapter to the payment of a continuation fee or renewal fee by the applicant or
patentee is taken to include a reference to the payment of that fee by a person
other than the applicant or patentee.
Chapter 14—Contracts
144
Void conditions
(1) A condition in a contract relating to the
sale or lease of, or a licence to exploit, a patented invention is void if the
effect of the condition would be:
(a) to prohibit or restrict the buyer,
lessee or licensee from using a product or process (whether patented or not)
supplied or owned by a person other than the seller, lessor or licensor, or a
nominee of the seller, lessor or licensor; or
(b) to require the buyer, lessee or
licensee to acquire a product not protected by the patent from the seller,
lessor or licensor, or a nominee of the seller, lessor or licensor.
(1A) A condition in a contract relating to the
sale or lease of, or a licence to exploit, an invention the subject of an
innovation patent is void if the effect of the condition would be to:
(a) prohibit the buyer, lessee or
licensee from applying for examination of the patent; or
(b) impose restrictions on the
circumstances in which the buyer, lessee or licensee may apply for examination
of the patent.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if:
(a) the seller, lessor or licensor
proves that, at the time the contract was made, the buyer, lessee or licensee
had the option of buying the product, or obtaining a lease or licence, on
reasonable terms without the condition; and
(b) the contract entitles the buyer,
lessee or licensee to be relieved of the liability to comply with the condition
on giving the other party 3 months’ notice in writing and paying, in
compensation for the relief:
(i) in the case of a
sale—such sum as is fixed by an arbitrator appointed by the Minister; or
(ii) in the case of a lease
or licence—such rent or royalty as is so fixed for the rest of the term of the
contract.
(3) A person
is not stopped from applying for or obtaining relief in any proceedings under this
Act merely because of an admission made by the person about the reasonableness
of terms offered to the person as mentioned in paragraph (2)(a).
(4) It is a defence to proceedings for
infringement of a patent that the patented invention is, or was when the
proceedings were started, the subject of a contract containing a provision,
inserted by the patentee, that is void under this section.
(5) If the patentee offers the other parties
to a contract mentioned in subsection (4) a new contract that does not
contain the void condition but that otherwise gives the parties the same rights
as the existing contract, then, whether or not the other parties accept the new
contract in place of the existing contract, subsection (4) ceases to
apply, but the patentee is not entitled to damages or an account of profit for
an infringement of the patent committed before the offer of the new contract.
145
Termination of contract after patent ceases to be in force
(1) A contract relating to the lease of, or a
licence to exploit, a patented invention may be terminated by either party, on
giving 3 months’ notice in writing to the other party, at any time after the
patent, or all the patents, by which the invention was protected at the time
the contract was made, have ceased to be in force.
(2) Subsection (1) applies despite
anything to the contrary in that contract or in any other contract.
146
Effect of Chapter
Nothing in this Chapter:
(a) affects a condition in a contract
that prohibits a person from selling products other than those of a particular
person; or
(b) validates a contract that would
otherwise be invalid; or
(c) affects a right to terminate a
contract, or to terminate a condition of a contract, being a condition
exercisable independently of this section; or
(d) affects
a condition in a contract for the lease of, or a licence to exploit, a patented
product, that reserves to the lessor or licensor the right to supply new parts
of the patented product that are required to put or keep it in repair.
Chapter 15—Special provisions relating to associated technology
147
Certificate by Director as to associated technology
(1) Where the Commissioner considers that a
specification in respect of an application may contain information of a kind
referred to in the definition of associated technology in
subsection 4(1) of the Safeguards Act, the Commissioner must give the Director
written notice to that effect together with a copy of the patent request and
specification.
(2) On receiving a notice, the Director may,
if satisfied that the specification contains information of that kind, issue a
certificate to that effect.
(3) Where the Director is satisfied that:
(a) the possession by the applicant or
the nominated person of the associated technology containing the information
was not in accordance with a permit; or
(b) the
communication of the information involved in making the application was not in
accordance with an authority;
the Director may include in the certificate:
(c) if the application is not a
relevant international application—a direction that the application should
lapse; or
(d) if the application is a relevant
international application—a direction that the application should not be
treated as an international application.
(4) Where the Director issues a certificate,
the Director must give a copy of it to the Commissioner who must give a copy to
the applicant.
148
Lapsing etc. of applications
(1) Where:
(a) the Commissioner receives a copy
of a certificate under subsection 147(2) in relation to an application; and
(b) the
certificate includes a direction under subsection 147(3);
then, upon receipt by the Commissioner of that copy:
(c) if the application is not a
relevant international application—the application lapses; or
(d) if the application is a relevant
international application—the application must cease to be treated as an
international application.
(2) Where an application has lapsed under
this section, the Commissioner must publish a notice to that effect in the Official
Journal.
149 Revocation
of direction
Where under section 148 an
application has lapsed, or has ceased to be treated as an international
application, because of a direction by the Director under section 147, the
applicant may apply in writing to the Director for the revocation of the
direction and the Director may revoke the direction.
150
Restoration of lapsed application
(1) Where an application has lapsed under
section 148, the applicant may, in writing, ask the Commissioner to
restore it.
(2) On receiving a request, the Commissioner
must restore the application if satisfied that:
(a) the relevant direction of the
Director is no longer in force; and
(b) there is no other reason not to do
so.
(3) Where the Commissioner restores an
application, the Commissioner must publish a notice to that effect in the
Official Journal.
(4) Where an application is restored under
this section, such provisions as are prescribed have effect for the protection
or compensation of persons who exploited (or took definite steps by contract or
otherwise to exploit) the relevant invention after the lapse of the application
and before the day on which its restoration was notified in the Official
Journal.
(5) Proceedings cannot be started under
section 57 in respect of anything done during the period from and
including the day on which the application lapsed to and including the day on
which its restoration was notified in the Official Journal.
151
Reinstatement of application as an international application
(1) Where a relevant international
application has ceased to be treated as an international application under
section 148, the applicant may ask the Commissioner in writing to
reinstate it.
(2) On receiving a request, the Commissioner
must reinstate the application as an international application if satisfied
that:
(a) the relevant direction of the
Director is no longer in force; and
(b) there is no other reason not to do
so.
(3) Where the Commissioner reinstates an
application as an international application, the application must be treated as
an international application.
(4) Where:
(a) the relevant international
application specifies Australia as a designated State; and
(b) the Commissioner cannot reinstate
the application merely because, under the PCT, it is to be considered as having
been withdrawn; and
(c) the applicant files, within the
prescribed period, a written request signed by the applicant that the
application be treated as an application under this Act for a standard patent;
and
(d) the
applicant files any prescribed documents and pays the prescribed fee;
then, except as otherwise prescribed:
(e) the application must be treated as
requested; and
(f) the description, claims and
drawings in the application must be treated as a complete specification filed
in respect of the application; and
(g) the application and complete
specification must be treated as having been filed on the date on which the
relevant international application was filed.
152
Notice of prohibitions or restrictions on publication
(1) Where the Director issues a certificate
under section 147 in relation to an application, the Director may give
written notice to the Commissioner of any prohibitions or restrictions on the
publication or communication of the information in the specification, or in a
relevant abstract, that the Director considers appropriate.
(2) On receiving a notice, the Commissioner
must take such steps as are necessary or expedient to give effect to it.
(3) Without limiting the generality of subsection (2),
the Commissioner may, by written order, prohibit or restrict the publication or
communication of information about the subject‑matter of the application,
whether generally or in relation to a particular person or class of persons.
(4) A person
must not, except in accordance with the written consent of the Commissioner,
publish or communicate information in contravention of an order.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
153
Effect of order
(1) Where an order is in force in relation to
an application for a standard patent, the application may proceed up to the
acceptance of the patent request and complete specification, but the complete
specification must not be made open to public inspection, the acceptance must
not be notified in the Official Journal and a patent must not be granted
on the application.
(2) While an
order is in force in relation to an application for an innovation patent, the
application may proceed up to the acceptance of the patent request and complete
specification but a patent must not be granted on the application.
(3) Where an order in relation to an
application for a standard patent has been revoked after the acceptance of the
patent request and complete specification, the acceptance must be notified in
the Official Journal within the prescribed period.
(4) Nothing in this Act prevents disclosing
information about an invention to the Director for the purpose of obtaining
advice on whether an order should be made, amended or revoked.
Chapter 16—Jurisdiction and powers of courts
154
Jurisdiction of Federal Court
(1) The Federal Court has jurisdiction with
respect to matters arising under this Act.
(2) The jurisdiction of the Federal Court to
hear and determine appeals against decisions or directions of the Commissioner
is exclusive of the jurisdiction of any other court except the jurisdiction of
the High Court under section 75 of the Constitution.
(3) A prosecution for an offence against this
Act must not be started in the Federal Court.
155
Jurisdiction of other prescribed courts
(1) Each prescribed court (other than the
Federal Court) has jurisdiction with respect to matters arising under this Act
in respect of which proceedings may, under this Act, be started in a prescribed
court.
(2) The jurisdiction conferred by subsection (1)
on the Supreme Court of a Territory is conferred:
(a) in the case of proceedings for the
infringement of a patent or proceedings under subsection 125(1) or section 128,
or a matter arising under this Act that may be heard and determined in the
course of such proceedings—to the extent that the Constitution permits; and
(b) in any other case—only in relation
to proceedings instituted by a natural person who is resident in the Territory,
or a corporation that has its principal place of business in the Territory, at
the time the proceedings are started.
156
Exercise of jurisdiction
The jurisdiction of a prescribed court
under section 154 or 155 is to be exercised by a single judge.
157
Transfer of proceedings
(1) A prescribed court in which proceedings
under this Act have been started may, on the application of a party made at any
stage in the proceedings, by order, transfer the proceedings to another
prescribed court having jurisdiction to hear and determine the proceedings.
(2) Where a court transfers proceedings to
another court:
(a) all documents of record relevant
to those proceedings filed in the transferring court shall be sent to the other
court by the Registrar or other appropriate officer of the transferring court;
and
(b) the other court shall proceed as
if the proceedings had been started in the other court and as if the same steps
in the proceedings had been taken there as had been taken in the transferring
court.
158
Appeals
(1) An appeal lies to the Federal Court
against a judgment or order of:
(a) another prescribed court
exercising jurisdiction under this Act; or
(b) any other court in proceedings
under subsection 120(1) or section 128.
(2) Except with the leave of the Federal
Court, an appeal does not lie to the Full Court of the Federal Court against a
judgment or order of a single judge of the Federal Court in the exercise of its
jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from decisions or directions of the
Commissioner.
(3) With the special leave of the High Court,
an appeal lies to the High Court against a judgment or order referred to in subsection (1).
(4) Except as otherwise provided by this
section, an appeal does not lie against a judgment or order referred to in subsection (1).
159
Commissioner may appear in appeals
The
Commissioner may appear and be heard at the hearing of an appeal to the Federal
Court against a decision or direction of the Commissioner even if the
Commissioner is not a party to the appeal.
160
Powers of Federal Court
On hearing an appeal against a decision
or direction of the Commissioner, the Federal Court may do any one or more of
the following:
(a) admit further evidence orally, or
on affidavit or otherwise;
(b) permit the examination and cross‑examination
of witnesses, including witnesses who gave evidence before the Commissioner;
(c) order an issue of fact to be tried
as it directs;
(d) affirm, reverse or vary the
Commissioner’s decision or direction;
(e) give any judgment, or make any
order, that, in all the circumstances, it thinks fit;
(f) order a party to pay costs to
another party.
Chapter 17—The Crown
Part 1—Introductory
161
Nominated persons and patentees
A reference in this Chapter to a
nominated person or to a patentee includes a reference to the successor in
title of the nominated person or patentee or an exclusive licensee of the
nominated person or patentee.
162
Commonwealth and State authorities
A reference in this Chapter to the
Commonwealth includes a reference to an authority of the Commonwealth and a
reference to a State includes a reference to an authority of a State.
Part 2—Exploitation by the Crown
163
Exploitation of inventions by Crown
(1) Where, at any time after a patent
application has been made, the invention concerned is exploited by the
Commonwealth or a State (or by a person authorised in writing by the
Commonwealth or a State) for the services of the Commonwealth or the State, the
exploitation is not an infringement:
(a) if the application is pending—of
the nominated person’s rights in the invention; or
(b) if a patent has been granted for
the invention—of the patent.
(2) A person may be authorised for the
purposes of subsection (1):
(a) before or after any act for which
the authorisation is given has been done; and
(b) before or after a patent has been granted
for the invention; and
(c) even if the person is directly or
indirectly authorised by the nominated person or patentee to exploit the
invention.
(3) Subject to section 168, an invention
is taken for the purposes of this Part to be exploited for services of the
Commonwealth or of a State if the exploitation of the invention is necessary
for the proper provision of those services within Australia.
164
Nominated person or patentee to be informed of exploitation
As soon as practicable after an invention
has been exploited under subsection 163(1), the relevant authority must inform
the applicant and the nominated person, or the patentee, of the exploitation
and give him or her any information about the exploitation that he or she from
time to time reasonably requires, unless it appears to the relevant authority
that it would be contrary to the public interest to do so.
165
Remuneration and terms for exploitation
(2) The terms for the exploitation of the
invention (including terms concerning the remuneration payable to the nominated
person or the patentee) are such terms as are agreed, or determined by a method
agreed, between the relevant authority and the nominated person or the patentee
or, in the absence of agreement, as are determined by a prescribed court on the
application of either party.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2),
the terms, or the method, may be agreed before, during or after the
exploitation.
(4) When fixing the terms, the court may take
into account any compensation that a person interested in the invention or the
patent has received, directly or indirectly, for the invention from the
relevant authority.
165A
Exploitation of invention to cease under court order
(1) A prescribed court may, on the
application of the nominated person or the patentee, declare that the
exploitation of the invention by the Commonwealth or the State is not, or is no
longer, necessary for the proper provision of services of the Commonwealth or
of the State if the court is satisfied that, in all the circumstances of the
case, it is fair and reasonable to make the declaration.
(2) The court may further order that the
Commonwealth or the State is to cease to exploit the invention:
(a) on and from the day specified in
the order; and
(b) subject
to any conditions specified in the order.
In making the order, the court is to ensure that the
legitimate interests of the Commonwealth or of the State are not adversely
affected by the order.
166
Previous agreements inoperative
An agreement or licence (whether made or
given before or after the commencement of this Act) fixing the terms on which a
person other than the Commonwealth or a State may exploit an invention is
inoperative with respect to the exploitation, after the commencement of this
Act, of the invention under subsection 163(1), unless the agreement or licence
has been approved:
(a) if the relevant authority is the
Commonwealth—by the Minister; or
(b) if the relevant authority is a
State—by the Attorney‑General of the State.
167 Sale of products
(1) The right to exploit an invention under
subsection 163(1) includes the right to sell products made in exercise of that
right.
(2) Where under subsection 163(1) the sale of
products is not an infringement of:
(a) a patent; or
(b) a
nominated person’s rights in the products;
the buyer, and any person claiming through the buyer, is
entitled to deal with the products as if the relevant authority were the
patentee or the nominated person.
168
Supply of products by Commonwealth to foreign countries
Where the Commonwealth has made an
agreement with a foreign country to supply to that country products required
for the defence of the country:
(a) the use of a product or process by
the Commonwealth, or by a person authorised in writing by the Commonwealth, for
the supply of that product is to be taken, for the purposes of this Chapter, to
be use of the product or process by the Commonwealth for the services of the
Commonwealth; and
(b) the Commonwealth or the authorised
person may sell those products to the country under the agreement; and
(c) the Commonwealth or the authorised
person may sell to any person any of the products that are not required for the
purpose for which they were made.
169
Declarations that inventions have been exploited
(1) Subject to subsection (4), a
patentee who considers that the patented invention has been exploited under
subsection 163(1) may apply to a prescribed court for a declaration to that
effect.
(2) In
proceedings under subsection (1):
(a) the
alleged relevant authority is the defendant; and
(b) the
alleged relevant authority may apply by way of counter‑claim in the
proceedings, for the revocation of the patent.
(3) The provisions of this Act relating to
the revocation of patents apply, with the necessary changes, to a counter‑claim.
(4) An application under subsection (1)
in respect of an innovation patent cannot be made unless the patent has been
certified.
170 Sale of forfeited articles
Nothing in this Chapter affects the
right of the Commonwealth or a State, or of a person deriving title directly or
indirectly from the Commonwealth or a State, to sell or use an article
forfeited under a law of the Commonwealth or the State.
Part 3—Acquisitions by and assignments to the Crown
171
Acquisition of inventions or patents by Commonwealth
(1) The Governor‑General may direct that a
patent, or an invention that is the subject of a patent application, be
acquired by the Commonwealth.
(2) When a direction is given, all rights in
respect of the patent or the invention are, by force of this subsection,
transferred to and vested in the Commonwealth.
(3) Notice of the acquisition must be:
(a) given to the applicant and the
nominated person, or the patentee; and
(b) published in the Official
Journal and the Gazette unless, in the case of the acquisition of an
invention that is the subject of an application for a patent, a prohibition
order, or an order under section 152, is in force in respect of the
application.
(4) The Commonwealth must pay a compensable
person such compensation as is agreed between the Commonwealth and the person
or, in the absence of agreement, as is determined by a prescribed court on the
application of either of them.
172
Assignment of invention to Commonwealth
(1) An inventor, or an inventor’s successor
in title, may assign the invention, and any patent granted or to be granted for
the invention, to the Commonwealth.
(2) The assignment and all covenants and
agreements in the assignment are valid and effectual, even if valuable
consideration has not been given for the assignment, and may be enforced by
proceedings in the name of the Minister.
Part 4—Prohibition orders
173
Prohibition of publication of information about inventions
(1) Subject to any directions of the
Minister, the Commissioner may, if it appears to the Commissioner to be
necessary or expedient to do so in the interests of the defence of the
Commonwealth, by written order:
(a) prohibit or restrict the
publication of information about the subject‑matter of an application for a
patent (including an international application); or
(b) prohibit or restrict access to a
micro‑organism deposited for the purposes of section 41 with a prescribed
depositary institution situated in Australia.
(2) A person
must not contravene a prohibition order except in accordance with the written
consent of the Commissioner.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
(3) A reference in subsection (1) to
giving access to a micro‑organism includes a reference to giving a sample of
the micro‑organism.
174
Effect of prohibition orders
(1) While a prohibition order is in force in
relation to an application for a standard patent, the application may proceed
up to the acceptance of the patent request and complete specification, but the
complete specification must not be made open to public inspection, the
acceptance must not be notified in the Official Journal and a patent
must not be granted on the application.
(2) Where a prohibition order in relation to
an application for a standard patent is revoked after the acceptance of the
patent request and complete specification, the acceptance must be notified in
the Official Journal within the prescribed period.
(3) While a prohibition order is in force in
relation to an application for an innovation patent, the application may
proceed up to the acceptance of the patent request and complete specification,
but a patent must not be granted on the application.
175
Disclosure of information to Commonwealth authority
Nothing in this Act prevents disclosing
information about an invention, or giving access to, or a sample of, a micro‑organism
to a department or authority of the Commonwealth for the purpose of obtaining
advice on whether a prohibition order should be made, amended or revoked.
176
International applications treated as applications under this Act
Where:
(a) an international application
specifies Australia as a designated State; and
(b) as a result of a prohibition order
or of anything done in reliance on section 175, the application is, under
the PCT, to be considered as having been withdrawn; and
(c) the applicant files, within the
prescribed period, a written request signed by the applicant that the
application be treated as an application under this Act for a standard patent;
and
(d) the
applicant files any prescribed documents and pays the prescribed fee;
then, except as otherwise prescribed:
(e) the application must be treated as
requested; and
(f) the description, claims and
drawings in the application must be treated as a complete specification filed
in respect of the application; and
(g) the application and specification
must be treated as having been filed on the date on which the international
application was filed.
Chapter 18—Miscellaneous offences
177
False representations about the Patent Office
(1) A person must not use, in connection with
his or her business, words that would reasonably lead to the belief that his or
her office is, or is officially connected with, the Patent Office.
Penalty: $3,000.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), a
person who:
(a) places, or allows to be placed, on
the building in which his or her office is situated; or
(b) uses when advertising his or her
office or business; or
(c) places
on a document, as a description of his or her office or business;
the words “Patent Office” or “Office for obtaining
patents”, or words of similar import, whether alone or together with other
words, is guilty of an offence against that subsection.
178
False representations about patents or patented articles
(1) A person must not falsely represent that
he or she, or another person, is the patentee of an invention.
Penalty: $6,000.
(1A) A person must not falsely represent that he
or she, or another person, is the patentee of an innovation patent that has
been certified.
Penalty: 60 penalty units.
(2) A person
must not falsely represent that an article sold by him or her is patented in Australia, or is the subject of an application for a patent in Australia.
Penalty: $6,000.
(3) Without
limiting subsection (2):
(a) a person is to be taken to
represent that an article is patented in Australia if the word “patent” or
“patented”, the words “provisional patent”, or any other word or words implying
that a patent for the article has been obtained in Australia, are stamped, engraved
or impressed on, or otherwise applied to, the article; and
(b) a person is to be taken to
represent that an article is the subject of an application for a patent in
Australia if the words “patent applied for” or “patent pending”, or any other
word or words implying that an application for a patent for the article has
been made in Australia, are stamped, engraved or impressed on, or otherwise
applied to, the article.
(4) A prosecution must not be started for an
offence against subsection (1) or (2) without the consent of the Minister,
or a person authorised by the Minister.
179
Failure to comply with summons
(1) A person who:
(a) is summoned by the Commissioner to
appear as a witness; and
(b) has
been offered payment of reasonable expenses;
must not fail to comply
with the summons.
Penalty: $1,000.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the
person has a lawful excuse.
Note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in
relation to the matter in subsection (2), see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal
Code.
180
Refusal to give evidence
(1) A person who appears before the
Commissioner must not refuse:
(a) to be sworn or to make an
affirmation; or
(b) to
answer questions that the person is lawfully required to answer.
Penalty: $3,000.
(2) Subsection (1)
does not apply if the person has a lawful excuse.
Note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in
relation to the matter in subsection (2), see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal
Code.
181
Failure to produce documents or articles
(1) A person who:
(a) is required by the Commissioner to
produce a document or article; and
(b) has
been offered payment of reasonable expenses;
must not fail to produce
it.
Penalty: $3,000.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the
person has a lawful excuse.
Note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in
relation to the matter in subsection (2), see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal
Code.
182
Officers not to traffic in inventions
(1) The Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner
or an employee must not buy, sell, acquire or traffic in:
(a) an invention or patent, whether
granted in Australia or anywhere else; or
(b) a
right to, or licence under, a patent, whether granted in Australia or anywhere else.
Penalty: $6,000.
(2) A purchase, sale, acquisition, assignment
or transfer made or entered into in contravention of this section is void.
(3) This section does not apply to the
inventor or to an acquisition by bequest or devolution by law.
183
Unauthorised disclosure of information by employees etc.
The Commissioner, each Deputy
Commissioner and each employee must not disclose information about a matter
that has been or is being dealt with under this Act or the 1952 Act unless
required or authorised to do so by this Act, a written direction of the
Commissioner or an order of a court.
184
Other unauthorised disclosures of information
A person to whom section 71 of the
Safeguards Act applies must not disclose information about a matter that has
been or is being dealt with under this Act or the 1952 Act unless required or
authorised to do so by the Safeguards Act, this Act, a written direction of the
Director or an order of a court.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
185
Commissioner etc. not to prepare documents or search records
The Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner
or an employee must not:
(a) prepare, or help to prepare:
(i) a specification; or
(ii) any other document
relating to a specification (other than a document which is in an approved
form);
unless the Commissioner, Deputy
Commissioner or the employee is the inventor in respect of the specification;
or
(b) search the records of the Patent
Office otherwise than in his or her official capacity.
Penalty: 10 penalty units.
Chapter 19—The Register and official documents
186
Register of Patents
(1) A Register of Patents is to be kept at
the Patent Office. The Register is to contain 2 parts as follows:
(a) a part dealing with standard
patents; and
(b) a part dealing with innovation
patents.
(2) The Register may be kept wholly or partly
by use of a computer.
(3) If the Register is kept wholly or partly
by use of a computer:
(a) references in this Act to an entry
in the Register are to be read as including references to a record of
particulars kept by use of the computer and comprising the Register or part of
the Register; and
(b) references in this Act to
particulars being registered, or entered in the Register, are to be read as
including references to the keeping of a record of those particulars as part of
the Register by use of the computer; and
(c) references in this Act to the
rectification of the Register are to be read as including references to the
rectification of the record of particulars kept by use of the computer and
comprising the Register or part of the Register.
187
Registration of particulars of patents etc.
(1) Particulars of standards patents in
force, and other prescribed particulars relating to standard patents (if any),
must be registered in that part of the Register dealing with standard patents.
(2) Particulars of innovation patents in
force, and other prescribed particulars relating to innovation patents (if
any), must be registered in that part of the Register dealing with innovation
patents.
188
Trusts not registrable
Notice of any kind of trust relating to
a patent or licence is not receivable by the Commissioner and must not be
registered.
189
Power of patentee to deal with patent
(1) A patentee may, subject only to any
rights appearing in the Register to be vested in another person, deal with the
patent as the absolute owner of it and give good discharges for any
consideration for any such dealing.
(2) This section does not protect a person
who deals with a patentee otherwise than as a purchaser in good faith for value
and without notice of any fraud on the part of the patentee.
(3) Equities in relation to a patent may be
enforced against the patentee except to the prejudice of a purchaser in good
faith for value.
190
Inspection of Register
(1) The Register must be available for
inspection at the Patent Office by any person during the hours that it is open
for business.
(2) If a record
of particulars is kept by use of a computer, subsection (1) is to be taken
to be complied with, to the extent that the Register consists of those
particulars, by giving members of the public access to a computer terminal
which they can use to inspect the particulars, either on a screen or in the
form of a computer printout.
191
False entries in Register
A person must not:
(a) make a false entry in the
Register; or
(b) cause a false entry to be made in
the Register; or
(c) tender
in evidence a document that falsely purports to be a copy of or extract from an
entry in the Register.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
192
Orders for rectification of Register
(1) A person aggrieved by:
(a) the omission of an entry from the
Register; or
(b) an entry made in the Register
without sufficient cause; or
(c) an entry wrongly existing in the
Register; or
(d) an
error or defect in an entry in the Register;
may apply to a prescribed court for an order to rectify
the Register.
(2) On hearing an application, the court may:
(a) decide any question which it is
necessary or expedient to decide in connection with the rectification of the
Register; and
(b) make any order it thinks fit for
the rectification of the Register.
(3) The
Commissioner:
(a) must be given notice of an
application; and
(b) may appear and be heard in the
proceedings; and
(c) must appear if directed to do so
by the court.
(4) An office copy of an order must be served
on the Commissioner by the Registrar or other appropriate officer of the court.
(5) On receiving an office copy of an order,
the Commissioner must rectify the Register accordingly.
193
Inspection of documents
All documents filed in connection with
the registration of prescribed particulars under section 187 must be
available for inspection at the Patent Office by any person during the hours
when it is open for business.
194
Information obtainable from Commissioner
The
Commissioner may give any person information about:
(a) a
patent; or
(b) an
application for a patent that is open to public inspection; or
(c) any prescribed document or matter.
195
Evidence—the Register
(1) The Register is prima facie evidence
of any particulars registered in it.
(2) If the Register is wholly or partly kept
by use of a computer, a document signed by the Commissioner reproducing in
writing all or any of the particulars comprising the Register, or that part of
it, is admissible in any proceedings as prima facie evidence of those
particulars.
196
Evidence—unregistered particulars
A document in respect of which
particulars have not been entered in the Register is not admissible in any
proceedings in proof of the title to a patent or to an interest in a patent
unless:
(a) the court or tribunal before which
the proceedings are brought otherwise directs; or
(b) the proceedings are:
(i) for an order under
section 192; or
(ii) to enforce equities in
relation to a patent or licence.
197
Evidence—certificate and copies of documents
(1) A signed certificate to the effect that:
(a) anything required or permitted by
this Act or the 1952 Act to be done or not to be done had or had not been done
on a date specified in the certificate; or
(b) a
document in the Patent Office or its library was available for public
inspection on a date specified in the certificate;
is prima facie evidence of the matters in the
certificate.
(2) A signed copy of or signed extract from
the Register is admissible in any proceedings as if it were the original.
(3) A signed copy of or signed extract from a
document in the Patent Office or its library is admissible in any proceedings
as if it were the original.
(4) In this section:
signed means signed by the Commissioner.
Chapter 20—Patent Attorneys
Part 1—Registration, privileges and professional conduct
198
Registration of patent attorneys
(1) A Register of Patent Attorneys is to be
kept by the Designated Manager.
Note: Designated Manager is defined by
section 200A.
(2) The Register of Patent Attorneys may be
kept wholly or partly by use of a computer.
(3) If the Register of Patent Attorneys is
kept wholly or partly by use of a computer, references in this Act to an entry
in the Register of Patent Attorneys are to be read as including references to a
record of particulars kept by use of the computer and comprising the Register
of Patent Attorneys or part of the Register of Patent Attorneys.
(4) The Designated Manager must register as a
patent attorney a person who:
(a) is ordinarily resident in Australia; and
(b) holds such qualifications as are
specified in, or ascertained in accordance with, the regulations; and
(c) has been employed as prescribed
for not less than the prescribed period; and
(d) is of good fame, integrity and
character; and
(e) has not been convicted of a
prescribed offence during the previous 5 years; and
(f) is not under sentence of
imprisonment for a prescribed offence.
The registration is to consist of entering the person’s
name in the Register of Patent Attorneys.
(5) A qualification specified in, or
ascertained in accordance with, regulations made for the purposes of paragraph (4)(b)
may consist of passing an examination conducted by the Professional Standards
Board. This subsection does not limit paragraph (4)(b).
(6) Paragraphs (4)(e) and (f) do not
limit paragraph (4)(d).
(7) For the purposes of this section, a
person is taken to be ordinarily resident in Australia if:
(a) the person has his or her home in Australia; or
(b) Australia is the country of his or
her permanent abode even though he or she is temporarily absent from Australia;
but the person is taken not to be ordinarily resident in Australia if he or she resides in Australia for a special or temporary purpose only.
(8) A reference in this section to conviction
of an offence includes a reference to the making of an order under section 19B
of the Crimes Act 1914, or a corresponding provision of a law of a State
or a Territory, in relation to the offence.
199
Deregistration
The name of a person registered as a
patent attorney may be removed from the Register of Patent Attorneys in the
prescribed manner and on the prescribed grounds.
200
Privileges
(1) A registered patent attorney:
(a) is entitled to prepare all
documents, transact all business and conduct all proceedings for the purposes
of this Act; and
(b) has such other rights and
privileges as are prescribed.
(2) A communication between a registered
patent attorney and the attorney’s client in intellectual property matters,,
and any record or document made for the purposes of such a communication, are
privileged to the same extent as a communication between a solicitor and his or
her client.
(3) Nothing in this section authorises a
registered patent attorney to prepare a document to be issued from or filed in
a court or to transact business, or conduct proceedings, in a court.
(4) In this
section:
intellectual property matters means:
(a) matters relating to patents; or
(b) matters relating to trade marks;
or
(c) matters relating to designs; or
(d) any related matters.
200A
Designated Manager
For the purposes of this Act, a person
is the Designated Manager if the person occupies, or is acting in, a position
that:
(a) is usually occupied by an SES
employee; and
(b) has been declared by the Secretary
of the Department, in writing, to be the position of Designated Manager.
Part 2—Offences
201
Offences: unregistered persons etc.
(1) A person must not carry on business,
practise or act as a patent attorney unless the person is a registered patent
attorney or a legal practitioner.
Penalty: $3,000.
(2) The
members of a partnership must not carry on business, practise or act as patent
attorneys unless at least one member is a registered patent attorney or a legal
practitioner.
Penalty: $3,000.
(3) A person
must not describe himself or herself, or hold himself or herself out, or permit
himself or herself to be described or held out, as a patent attorney, or agent
for obtaining patents unless the person is a registered patent attorney.
Penalty: $3,000.
(4) The members of a partnership must not
describe the partnership, or hold the partnership out, or permit the
partnership to be described or held out, as patent attorneys, or agents for
obtaining patents, unless at least one member is a registered patent attorney.
Penalty: 30 penalty units.
(5) A company
must not carry on business, practise, act, describe itself or hold itself out,
or permit itself to be described or held out, as a patent attorney or agent for
obtaining patents.
Penalty: $15,000.
(6) It is not an offence against subsection (1),
(2) or (5) if the legal representative of a deceased patent attorney:
(a) carries on the patent attorney’s
business for not more than 3 years after the patent attorney’s death or for any
further period allowed by a prescribed court; and
(b) is a registered patent attorney,
or employs a registered patent attorney to manage the business on his or her
behalf.
(7) For the purposes of this section, a
person or company is taken to carry on business, practise or act as a patent
attorney if, and only if, the person or company does, or undertakes to do, on
behalf of someone else, any of the following in Australia for gain:
(a) applying for or obtaining patents
in Australia or anywhere else;
(b) preparing specifications or other
documents for the purposes of this Act or the patent law of another country;
(c) giving advice (other than advice
of a scientific or technical nature) about the validity, or infringement, of
patents.
(8) A person does not commit an offence
against subsection (1) in respect of anything done, or undertaken to be
done, by the person in the capacity of employee for:
(a) in any case—the person’s employer;
or
(b) if the person’s employer is a
member of a related company group—another member of the group.
(9) A company that is a member of a related
company group does not commit an offence against subsection (5) in respect
of anything done, or undertaken to be done, by the company for another member
of the group.
(10) In this section:
related company group means a group of 2 or
more companies, where each member of the group is related to each other member
of the group.
(11) For the purposes of this section, the
question of whether a company is related to another company is to be determined
in the same manner as that question is determined under the Corporations Act
2001.
202
Documents prepared by legal practitioners
A legal practitioner must not prepare a
specification, or a document relating to an amendment of a specification,
unless:
(a) the practitioner is acting under
the instructions of a registered patent attorney; or
(b) the
amendment has been directed by an order under section 105.
Penalty: $3,000.
202A
Documents prepared by a member of a partnership
A person who is:
(a) a member of a partnership; and
(b) not a registered patent attorney;
must not prepare a specification, or a document relating
to an amendment of a specification, unless:
(c) the person is acting under the
instructions or supervision of a registered patent attorney; or
(d) the amendment has been directed by
an order under section 105.
Penalty: 30 penalty units.
203
Attendance at patent attorney’s office
A registered patent attorney must not
practise, act, or hold himself or herself out as practising or acting, as a
patent attorney, at an office or place of business where specifications or
other documents are prepared for the purposes of this Act, unless he or she, or
another registered patent attorney, is in regular attendance at, and in
continuous charge of, that office or place.
Penalty: $3,000.
204
Time for starting prosecutions
Despite section 15B of the Crimes
Act 1914, a prosecution for an offence against subsection 201(1), (2), (3),
(4) or (5), or section 202, 202A or 203, may be started at any time within
5 years after the offence was committed.
Chapter 21—Administration
205
Patent Office and sub‑offices
(1) For the purposes of this Act, there is to
be an office called the Patent Office.
(2) There is to be a sub‑office of the Patent
Office in each State.
206
Patent Office seal
There is to be a seal of the Patent
Office and impressions of the seal must be judicially noticed.
207
Commissioner of Patents
(1) There is to be a Commissioner of Patents.
(2) The Commissioner has such powers and
functions as are conferred on him or her under this Act or any other Act.
208
Deputy Commissioner of Patents
(1) There is to be at least one Deputy
Commissioner of Patents.
(2) Subject to any direction by the
Commissioner, a Deputy Commissioner has all the powers and functions of the
Commissioner under this Act or any other Act, except the Commissioner’s powers
of delegation under section 209.
(3) A power or function of the Commissioner
under this Act or any other Act, when exercised by a Deputy Commissioner, is to
be taken, for the purposes of this Act or any other Act, to have been exercised
by the Commissioner.
(4) The exercise of a power or function of
the Commissioner under this Act or any other Act by a Deputy Commissioner does
not prevent the exercise of the power or function by the Commissioner.
(5) Where,
under this Act or any other Act, the exercise of a power or function by the
Commissioner, or the operation of a provision of this Act or any other Act, is
dependent on the opinion, belief or state of mind of the Commissioner in
relation to a matter, that power or function may be exercised by a Deputy
Commissioner, and that provision may operate, as the case may be, on the
opinion, belief or state of mind of the Deputy Commissioner in relation to that
matter.
209
Delegation of Commissioner’s powers and functions
(1) The Commissioner may, by instrument,
signed by him or her, delegate all or any of the Commissioner’s powers or
functions under this Act or any other Act to a prescribed employee, or a
prescribed class of employees.
(2) A delegate must, if so required by the
instrument of delegation, exercise or perform a delegated power or function
under the direction or supervision of the Commissioner or an employee specified
in the instrument.
210
Commissioner’s powers
The Commissioner may, for the purposes
of this Act:
(a) summon witnesses; and
(b) receive written or oral evidence
on oath or affirmation; and
(c) require the production of
documents or articles; and
(d) award costs against a party to
proceedings before the Commissioner.
211
Recovery of costs awarded by Commissioner
Costs awarded by the Commissioner
against a party are recoverable as a debt.
Chapter 22—Miscellaneous
212
Copies of examination reports to be communicated
A copy of
each report relating to an examination or a re‑examination under this Act must,
subject to Chapters 15 and 17, be given to the applicant or patentee, as
the case requires.
213
Making and signing applications etc.
An application, notice or request
required or permitted under this Act to be made or signed by a person may be
made or signed, on behalf of that person, by a registered patent attorney.
214
Filing of documents
A document may be filed with the Patent
Office by delivering the document to a sub‑office of the Patent Office either
personally or by post or by any other prescribed means.
215
Death of applicant or nominated person
(1) If an applicant dies before a patent is
granted on the application, his or her legal representative may proceed with
the application.
(2) If a nominated person dies before a
patent is granted on the application, the patent may be granted to his or her
legal representative.
(3) Where, at any time after a patent is
granted, the Commissioner is satisfied that the patentee had died (or, in the
case of a body corporate, had ceased to exist) before the patent was granted,
the Commissioner may amend the patent by substituting for the name of the
patentee the name of the person to whom the patent should have been granted.
(4) An amendment by the Commissioner has
effect, and is to be taken always to have had effect, accordingly.
216
Exercise of discretionary power by Commissioner
(1) The Commissioner must not exercise a
discretionary power under this Act adversely to any person applying for the
exercise of that power without first giving that person a reasonable
opportunity to be heard.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply in
relation to the Commissioner’s power to direct an applicant to request an examination.
217
Assessors
A prescribed court may, if it thinks
fit, call in the aid of an assessor to assist it in the hearing and trial or
determination of any proceedings under this Act.
218
Costs where patent invalid in part
In any proceedings in which the validity
of a patent is disputed, the court may, if it is satisfied that some of the
claims in the complete specification which are alleged to be invalid are not
invalid but that other claims are invalid, apportion the costs between the
parties to the proceedings as it thinks just.
219
Security for costs
If a person who neither resides nor
carries on business in Australia:
(a) gives notice of opposition under
this Act; or
(b) appeals
to the Federal Court;
the Commissioner or the Federal Court, as the case may be,
may require the person to give security for the costs of the proceeding or
appeal and, where such security is not given to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner or the Federal Court, as the case may be, may dismiss the
proceeding or appeal.
220
Costs of attendance of patent attorney
Where, at the hearing of proceedings
under this Act, a registered patent attorney attends in court for the purpose
of assisting a party in the conduct of the hearing and an order is made for
payment of the costs of that party, those costs may include an allowance for
that attendance.
221
Service of documents
Where this Act provides for a document
to be served on, or given or sent to, a person and the person has given the
Commissioner an address in Australia for service of documents, the document may
be served on, or given or sent to, the person by post to that address.
222
Publication of Official Journal etc.
(1) The Commissioner shall issue periodically
an official journal containing such matters as are prescribed and such other
matters (if any) as the Commissioner thinks fit.
(2) The Commissioner must make arrangements
for selling copies of the Official Journal, and of complete
specifications which are open to public inspection.
(3) The Commissioner may prepare, publish and
sell such documents relating to inventions and patents as the Commissioner
thinks fit.
222A
Doing act when Patent Office reopens after end of period otherwise provided for
doing act
(1) If the last day of a period provided by
this Act (except this section) for doing an act is a day when the Patent
Office, or a sub‑office of the Patent Office, is not open for business, the act
may be done in prescribed circumstances on the next day when the office or sub‑office
is open for business.
(2) For the purposes of this section, the
Patent Office, or a sub‑office of the Patent Office, is taken not to be open
for business on a day:
(a) declared by regulations to be a
day on which the office or sub‑office is not open for business; or
(b) declared, by a prescribed person
in writing published in the prescribed way, to be a day on which the office or
sub‑office is not open for business.
Declarations
(3) A declaration mentioned in
paragraph (2)(a) or (b) may identify the day by reference to its being
declared a public holiday by or under a law of a State or Territory. This does
not limit the way the declaration may identify the day.
(4) A declaration mentioned in
paragraph (2)(b):
(a) may be made before, on or after
the day; and
(b) is not a legislative instrument.
Relationship with other law
(5) This section has effect despite the rest
of this Act.
(6) Subsection 36(2) of the Acts
Interpretation Act 1901 does not apply in relation to the act mentioned in
subsection (1) of this section.
Exception for prescribed act
(7) This section does not apply to a
prescribed act.
Note: Subsection 36(2) of the Acts Interpretation
Act 1901 is relevant to a prescribed act.
223
Extensions of time [see also Table B]
(1) The Commissioner must extend the time for
doing a relevant act that is required to be done within a certain time if the
act is not, or cannot be, done within that time because of an error or omission
by:
(a) the Commissioner or a Deputy
Commissioner; or
(b) an employee; or
(c) a person providing, or proposing
to provide, services for the benefit of the Patent Office.
(2) Where,
because of:
(a) an error or omission by the person
concerned or by his or her agent or attorney; or
(b) circumstances
beyond the control of the person concerned;
a relevant act that is required to be done within a
certain time is not, or cannot be, done within that time, the Commissioner may,
on application made by the person concerned in accordance with the regulations,
extend the time for doing the act.
(2A) If:
(a) a relevant act that is required to
be done within a certain time is not done within that time; and
(b) the Commissioner is satisfied that
the person concerned took due care, as required in the circumstances, to ensure
the doing of the act within that time;
the Commissioner must, on application made by the person
concerned in accordance with the regulations and within the prescribed period,
extend the time for doing the act.
(2B) An extension of time under subsection (2A)
cannot exceed the period prescribed for the purposes of this subsection.
(3) The time allowed for doing a relevant act
may be extended, whether before or after that time has expired.
(3A) Despite subsection (3), the time
allowed for doing a relevant act may be extended under subsection (2A)
only after that time has expired.
(4) The Commissioner must advertise in the Official
Journal:
(a) an application made for an
extension of time for more than 3 months; or
(b) an application made for an
extension of time for doing a prescribed relevant act in prescribed
circumstances.
(6) Subject to subsection (6A), a person
may, as prescribed, oppose the granting under subsection (2) or (2A) of
the application.
(6A) If the Commissioner is satisfied that an
application under subsection (2) or (2A) would not be granted even in the
absence of opposition under subsection (6):
(a) the Commissioner need not
advertise the application in accordance with subsection (4); and
(b) the application cannot be opposed,
despite subsection (6); and
(c) the Commissioner must refuse to
grant the application.
(7) Where:
(a) a patent application lapses, or a
patent ceases, because of a failure to do one or more relevant acts within the
time allowed; and
(b) the
time for doing that act or those acts is extended;
the application or patent must be treated as having been
restored.
(8) Where:
(a) a
provisional patent application lapses under subsection 142(1) at the end of the
period prescribed for the purposes of section 38; and
(b) that
period is extended;
the application must be treated as if it had not lapsed.
(9) Where the
Commissioner grants:
(a) an extension of more than 3 months
for doing a relevant act; or
(b) an extension of time for doing a
prescribed relevant act in prescribed circumstances;
the prescribed provisions have effect for the protection
or compensation of persons who, before the day on which the application for
extension of time is advertised under subsection (4), exploited (or took
definite steps by way of contract or otherwise to exploit) the invention
concerned because of the failure to do the relevant act within the time
allowed, the lapsing of the patent application or the ceasing of the patent, as
the case may be.
(10) Infringement
proceedings cannot be brought in respect of an infringement committed:
(a) between the day on which the
patent application lapses and the day on which it is restored; or
(b) between the day on which the
patent ceases and the day on which it is restored.
(11) In this
section:
relevant act means an action (other than a
prescribed action) in relation to a patent, a patent application, or any
proceedings under this Act (other than court proceedings), and includes the
making of a Convention application within the time allowed for making such
applications.
224 Review
of decisions
(1) Application may be made to the
Administrative Appeals Tribunal for review of:
(a) a decision of the Commissioner
under section 10, 17, 32, 33, 52 or 66, subsection 74(3) or 103(2),
section 113, subsection 137(3), paragraph 142(2)(b), subsection 150(2),
151(2), 152(2) or 152(3), or section 173, 215 or 223; or
(b) a decision of the Designated
Manager under section 198 not to register a person as a patent attorney;
or
(c) a decision of the Director under
subsection 147(2) or (3), section 149 or subsection 152(1).
(2) Where a person who makes a decision
mentioned in subsection (1) gives the person or persons affected by the
decision written notice of the making of the decision, the notice must include
a statement to the effect that, subject to the Administrative Appeals
Tribunal Act 1975, application may be made to the Administrative Appeals
Tribunal for review of the decision to which the notice relates by or on behalf
of the person or persons whose interests are affected by the decision.
(3) Failure to comply with subsection (2)
in relation to a decision does not affect the validity of the decision.
(4) In this
section:
decision has the same meaning as in the Administrative
Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.
225
Conduct of employees and agents of natural persons
(3) Where it
is necessary to establish, for the purposes of a prosecution for an offence
under this Act, the state of mind of a person other than a company in relation
to particular conduct, it is sufficient to show:
(a) that the conduct was engaged in by
a servant or agent of the person within the scope of his or her actual or
apparent authority; and
(b) that the servant or agent had the
state of mind.
(4) Any conduct engaged in on behalf of a
person other than a company by the person’s servant or agent within the scope
of his or her actual or apparent authority is to be taken, for the purposes of
a prosecution for an offence under this Act, to have been engaged in also by
the person, unless the person establishes that he or she took reasonable
precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid the conduct.
(5) A reference in this section to an offence
under this Act includes a reference to an offence created by:
(a) section 6 of the Crimes
Act 1914 that relates to this Act or the regulations; or
(b) section 11.1, 11.2, 11.2A, 11.4
or 11.5 of the Criminal Code that relates to this Act or the
regulations.
(6) Where:
(a) a person other than a company is
convicted of an offence under this Act; and
(b) the
person would not have been convicted of the offence but for subsections (3)
and (4);
the person is not liable to be punished by imprisonment
for that offence.
(7) A reference in subsection (3) to the
state of mind of a person includes a reference to:
(a) the knowledge, intention, opinion,
belief or purpose of the person; and
(b) the person’s reasons for the
intention, opinion, belief or purpose.
(9) A reference in this section to engaging
in conduct includes a reference to failing or refusing to engage in conduct.
Note: For provisions relating to proof of offences
by bodies corporate, see Part 2.5 of the Criminal Code.
226
Reproduction of published specifications does not infringe copyright
The reproduction in 2 dimensions of the
whole or part of a provisional or complete specification that is open to public
inspection does not constitute an infringement of any copyright subsisting
under the Copyright Act 1968 in any literary or artistic work.
227
Fees
(1) The prescribed fees are payable in
accordance with the regulations.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1),
different fees may be prescribed in respect of the doing of an act according to
the time when the act is done.
(3) The regulations may provide for the
consequences (for the purposes of this Act) of failing to pay a fee in
accordance with the regulations.
Note: Some provisions of this Act provide expressly
or implicitly for the consequences of failing to pay a fee (for example, see
subsections 89(3) and 142(2), section 143, subsection 151(4) and section 176).
Regulations cannot provide for consequences inconsistent with those provisions.
(4) In
particular, the regulations may provide that, for the purposes of this Act:
(a) an act is not to be done, or is
taken not to have been done, if the fee for doing the act is not paid in
accordance with the regulations; or
(b) a document is not filed, or is
taken not to have been filed, if the fee for filing the document is not paid in
accordance with the regulations; or
(c) a patent application lapses, or is
taken to have lapsed, if the fee for filing the request and accompanying
specification is not paid in accordance with the regulations.
(5) Subsection (4) does not limit subsection (3).
227A
Professional Standards Board for Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys
(1) The Professional Standards Board for
Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys is established.
(2) The Professional Standards Board has the
following functions:
(a) such functions as are conferred on
the Professional Standards Board by this Act or the Trade Marks Act 1995;
(b) such functions as are conferred on
the Professional Standards Board by regulations made for the purposes of any of
the following provisions:
(i) paragraph 198(4)(b) of
this Act (which deals with the qualifications of patent attorneys);
(ii) section 199 of
this Act (which deals with the deregistration of patent attorneys);
(iii) paragraph 228(2)(r) of
this Act (which deals with the professional conduct of patent attorneys);
(iv) paragraph 228A(4)(a) of
the Trade Marks Act 1995 (which deals with the qualifications of trade
marks attorneys);
(v) section 228B of
the Trade Marks Act 1995 (which deals with the deregistration of trade
marks attorneys);
(vi) paragraph 231(2)(ha) of
the Trade Marks Act 1995 (which deals with the professional conduct of
trade marks attorneys);
(c) to do anything incidental to or
conducive to the performance of any of the above functions.
(3) The regulations may make provision for
and in relation to:
(a) the constitution and membership of
the Professional Standards Board; and
(b) the manner in which the
Professional Standards Board is to perform its functions; and
(c) the
procedure to be followed at or in relation to meetings of the Professional
Standards Board, including (but not limited to) matters with respect to:
(i) the convening of
meetings of the Board; and
(ii) the number of members
of the Board who are to constitute a quorum; and
(iii) the selection of a
member of the Board to preside at a meeting of the Board; and
(iv) the manner in which
questions arising at a meeting of the Board are to be decided.
(4) A member of the Professional Standards
Board is to be paid such remuneration as is determined by the Remuneration
Tribunal. If no determination of that remuneration by the Tribunal is in
operation, the member is to be paid such remuneration as is prescribed.
(5) A member of the Professional Standards
Board is to be paid such allowances as are prescribed.
(6) Subsections (4) and (5) have effect
subject to the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
228
Regulations
(1) The Governor‑General may make
regulations, not inconsistent with this Act:
(a) prescribing matters required or
permitted by this Act to be prescribed; and
(b) prescribing matters necessary or
convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to this Act; and
(c) prescribing matters necessary or
convenient to be prescribed for the conduct of any business relating to the
Patent Office; and
(d) for the purpose of carrying out or
giving effect to the Budapest Treaty; and
(e) for the purpose of carrying out or
giving effect to the PCT, whether in relation to PCT applications or otherwise.
(2) Without
limiting subsection (1), that subsection includes the power to make
regulations:
(a) making provision for and in
relation to the procedures for the examination of a patent request and complete
specification and the re‑examination of a complete specification; and
(b) making provision for and in
relation to the reports to be made in relation to an examination and a re‑examination;
and
(c) making provision for and in
relation to the amendment of patent requests, provisional and complete
specifications, and other filed documents:
(i) to correct a clerical
error or obvious mistake; or
(ii) to remove a lawful
ground of objection, whether the objection is raised in the course of
examination or re‑examination or otherwise; or
(iii) for any other purpose;
and
(e) making provision for and in
relation to the amendment of an entry in the Register to correct a clerical
error or an obvious mistake, or for any other purpose; and
(f) making provision for and in
relation to the amendment of a patent to correct a clerical error or an obvious
mistake; and
(g) making provision for and in
relation to the preparation, filing and publication of abstracts of complete
specifications; and
(h) making provision for and in
relation to opposition proceedings; and
(ha) setting out the formalities
checking process for innovation patents including, in particular, the following
matters:
(i) specifying the
formalities requirements (including compliance with the requirements of
subsections 18(2) and (3)) that must be met in respect of an application for an
innovation patent; and
(ii) empowering the
Commissioner to direct an applicant for an innovation patent to do such things
as are necessary to ensure that the application is in accordance with the
requirements of the regulations relating to the preparation of documents for
filing; and
(iii) providing for the
lapsing of the application if such a direction is not complied with within a
time specified in the regulations; and
(iv) providing for the
restoration of an application that has so lapsed; and
(j) empowering
the Commissioner to direct an applicant for a standard patent to do such things
as are necessary to ensure that the complete specification is in accordance
with the requirements of the regulations relating to the preparation of
documents for filing and:
(i) providing for the
lapsing of the application if such a direction is not complied with within a
time specified in the regulations; and
(ii) providing for the
restoration of an application that has so lapsed; and
(k) empowering the Commissioner to
hear and determine the question whether a person is an interested person for
the purpose of doing any act permitted to be done under this Act by an
interested person; and
(m) providing for appeals against
decisions of the Commissioner made under the regulations; and
(n) making provision for and in
relation to the practice and procedure of prescribed courts in proceedings
under this Act, including provision prescribing the time within which any
proceeding may be started or anything else may be done, and providing for the
extension of any such time; and
(p) requiring
persons to make statutory declarations in relation to patent applications or
patents or in proceedings under this Act (not being court proceedings); and
(q) making provision for and in
relation to the making of a declaration, or the doing of an act, under this Act
on behalf of a person who, because of infancy or physical or mental disability,
is unable to make the declaration or do the act; and
(r) for the control of the
professional conduct of registered patent attorneys and the practice of the
profession and, for that purpose, making provision for and in relation to all
or any of the following:
(i) making complaints, and
hearing charges, against registered patent attorneys about their professional
conduct;
(ii) imposing penalties on
registered patent attorneys, including issuing a reprimand and suspending or
cancelling registration;
(iii) summoning witnesses;
(iv) requiring persons to
give evidence on oath (whether orally or otherwise);
(v) administering oaths to
persons giving evidence (whether orally or otherwise);
(vi) requiring persons to
produce documents or articles; and
(s) making provision for and in
relation to:
(i) the deposit for the
purposes of this Act, the Budapest Treaty, or both, of micro‑organisms with
prescribed depositary institutions and the storage and testing of, and
furnishing of samples of, micro‑organisms by those institutions; and
(ii) the charging of fees
by prescribed depositary institutions situated in Australia in relation to the
matters described in subparagraph (i); and
(iii) the making of reports
by prescribed depositary institutions situated in Australia in relation to
those matters; and
(iv) the powers and
functions of the Commissioner in relation to prescribed depositary institutions
with respect to those matters; and
(t) modifying
the operation of this Act in relation to PCT applications that are treated as
patent applications under this Act by excluding, varying, or substituting
different provisions for, specified provisions of this Act; and
(u) making provision for and in
relation to the destruction of documents relating to applications for patents
filed not less than 25 years before the time of destruction; and
(w) making provision for and in
relation to the refund, in specified circumstances, of the whole or part of a
fee paid in respect of the filing of a document; and
(y) making provision for and in
relation to the remission of, or the exemption of specified classes of persons
from the payment of, the whole or part of a fee; and
(z) prescribing penalties for offences
against the regulations not exceeding a fine of $1,000; and
(za) making such transitional and
savings provisions as are necessary or convenient as a result of the repeal of
the 1952 Act and the enactment of this Act.
(3) The regulations may make provision for
matters referred to in paragraph (2)(s) by empowering the Commissioner, on
behalf of the Commonwealth, to enter into agreements with prescribed depositary
institutions with respect to those matters.
(4) Regulations made under paragraph (2)(s)
and subsection (3) may make different provision with respect to different
matters dealt with by or under those regulations, but this subsection shall not
be taken to limit a power to make regulations conferred by any other provision
of this Act.
(5) The Governor‑General is to make
regulations setting out the English texts of the Budapest Treaty and the PCT as
in force for Australia on the commencing day, and afterwards such regulations
as are necessary to keep those English texts in an up‑to‑date form.
(6) The Governor‑General may make regulations
setting out the English text of a treaty relating to the protection of
inventions to which Australia is a party (other than the Budapest Treaty or the
PCT), being the English text of the treaty as in force for Australia when the
regulations are made, and afterwards such regulations as are necessary to keep
that English text in an up‑to‑date form.
(7) Despite the repeal of the 1952 Act by
this Act, regulations made under paragraph (2)(za) may provide for the
continued operation of specified provisions of the 1952 Act in relation to
prescribed persons or matters, or in prescribed circumstances.
229
Consequential amendments
The Acts specified in Schedule 2
are amended as set out in that Schedule.
230
Repeal
The Patents Act 1952 is repealed.
Chapter 23—Transitional and savings provisions
231
Application of Part III of 1989 Amending Act
Nothing in this Act affects the
continued operation of Part III of the 1989 Amending Act.
233
Patents granted under 1952 Act
(1) Subject to this Chapter and the
regulations, this Act applies in relation to a standard patent or a petty
patent granted under the 1952 Act as if the patent had been granted under this
Act.
(2) A patent mentioned in subsection (1)
does not have effect in any place in which it did not have effect immediately
before the commencing day.
(3) Chapter 9 of this Act does not apply
in relation to a patent mentioned in subsection (1).
(4) Objection cannot be taken to a patent
mentioned in subsection (1), and such a patent is not invalid, so far as
the invention is claimed in any claim, on any ground that would not have been
available against the patent under the 1952 Act.
234
Applications under 1952 Act
(1) Where, before the commencing day:
(a) a patent application and
provisional specification had been lodged under the 1952 Act; and
(b) a complete specification had not
been lodged under that Act in respect of the application; and
(c) the
application had not been withdrawn;
then, subject to this Chapter and the regulations, this
Act applies in relation to the application on and after that day as if it were
a provisional application under this Act.
(2) Where,
before the commencing day:
(a) a
patent application had been lodged under the 1952 Act; and
(b) a complete specification, or a
petty patent specification, had been lodged under that Act in respect of the
application; and
(c) the
application had not been withdrawn or finally dealt with;
then, subject to this Chapter and the regulations, this
Act applies on and after that day:
(d) in relation to the application as
if it were a complete application made under this Act; and
(e) in relation to the petty patent
specification as if it were a complete specification filed under this Act in
respect of the application.
(3) Chapter 5 of this Act does not apply
in relation to an application mentioned in subsection (2), but Part V
of the 1952 Act, as in force immediately before the commencing day, continues
to apply in relation to such an application.
(4) Chapter 9 of this Act does not apply
in relation to:
(a) an application mentioned in subsection (2);
or
(b) a patent granted on such an
application.
(5) Objection cannot be taken to:
(a) an application mentioned in subsection (2);
or
(b) a
patent granted on such an application;
and such a patent is not invalid, so far as the invention
is claimed in any claim, on any ground that would not have been available
against the application or patent, as the case may be, under the 1952 Act.
(6) A petty patent specification to which subsection (2)
applies cannot be amended under this Act so as to include more than one claim.
235
Other applications and proceedings under 1952 Act
(1) Subject to this Chapter and the
regulations, this Act applies, on and after the commencing day, to any
application, request, action or proceeding made or started under the 1952 Act
and not finally dealt with or determined under that Act before that day as if
the application, request, action or proceeding had been made or started under a
corresponding provision of this Act.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply in
relation to an application covered by section 234 of this Act.
236
Micro‑organisms
Sections 41 and 42 of this Act do
not apply in relation to a specification lodged before 7 July 1987.
237
Orders, directions etc. under 1952 Act
Any report, order or direction made or
given under the 1952 Act and in force immediately before the commencing day
continues to have effect on and after that day as if it had been made or given
under a corresponding provision of this Act.
238
The Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner
The persons holding office as
Commissioner of Patents and Deputy Commissioner of Patents immediately before
the commencing day continue to hold those respective offices on and after that
day.
239
The Register of Patents and Register of Patent Attorneys
(1) On and after the commencing day, the
Register of Patents under the 1952 Act is to be taken to form part of the
Register of Patents under this Act.
(2) On and after the commencing day, the
Register of Patent Attorneys under the 1952 Act is to be taken to form part of
the Register of Patent Attorneys under this Act.
240
Registered patent attorneys
This Act applies, on and after the
commencing day, in relation to a person who was, immediately before that day, a
registered patent attorney under the 1952 Act as if the person had been
registered as a patent attorney under this Act.