Corporations Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 9) 2002 No. 282
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Statutory Rules 2002 No. 282
Issued by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer
Corporations Act 2001
Corporations Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 9)
Section 1364 of the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act) provides that the
Governor-General may make regulations prescribing matters required or permitted
by the Act to be prescribed by regulations or necessary or convenient to be
prescribed by such regulations for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.
Subsection 888A(1) of the Act provides that the situations in which
compensation may be claimed in respect of a loss that is connected with a
financial market to which Division 4 of Part 7.5 applies are as specified in
the regulations.
Paragraph 1074E(2)(b) of the Act provides that the regulations may specify the
rights, liabilities and obligations of a person in relation to the transfer of
a financial product through a prescribed clearing and settlement facility.
The purpose of the Regulations is to support the proposed reforms to the
clearing and settlement facilities of the Australian Stock Exchange. In
particular, the proposed Regulations would accommodate these reforms by
amending the Corporations Regulations relating to:
• the National Guarantee Fund, which is a statutory
fund of approximately $160M which provides a source of compensation for
investors when, for example, their stockbroker becomes insolvent, and also
provides financial support for clearing transactions entered into on the
Australian Stock Exchange; and
• transfer of title, in particular, the indemnities
required in connection with electronic transfer of legal title to securities.
The proposed amendments do not reflect any change in policy.
Details of the Regulations are set out in the Attachment.
The Regulations will commence on 1 December 2002. This date has been chosen
because it is important that the regulations commence at the same time as
several other documents, including the variation of the clearing and settlement
facility licence of the Options Clearing House Pty Limited and amendments to
the operating rules of various subsidiaries of the Australian Stock Exchange
Limited.
ATTACHMENT
1. INTRODUCTION
Overview
The Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) proposes to restructure its clearing and
settlement arrangements.
To facilitate this, amendments have been made to the Corporations Regulations.
The amendments relate only to:
• investor protection and the financial support
provided to ASX entities by the National Guarantee Fund; and
• indemnities in connection with the transfer of
title to securities.
There is no intention to change the policy inherent in the relevant regulations
including the coverage of the National Guarantee Fund.
The current situation
The ASX group of companies operates both financial markets and clearing and
settlement facilities.
The two markets it operates are:
• the Australian Stock Exchange - ie the main market
for securities and options;
• ASX Futures - a small market for futures
contracts.
The group also operates clearing and settlement facilities:
• a facility operated by the Options Clearing House
Pty Limited (the Options Clearing House) for futures contracts and the initial
processing of option contracts;
• a facility operated by ASX Settlement and Transfer
Corporation Pty Limited for securities (including settlement following the
exercise of options over shares).
In brief, clearing and settlement facilities calculate payment obligations and
obligations to provide, for example, securities following transactions entered
into on the ASX's markets, and provide the mechanisms for meeting those
obligations.
They are required to have an Australian CS facility licence under Part 7.3 of
the Corporations Act 2001.
Re-structuring in brief
The ASX is restructuring its clearing and settlement facilities and the
services they provide.
The first stage of the restructuring involves:
• changing the central counterparty for securities
transactions from TNS Clearing Pty Limited to the Options Clearing House;
• consolidating the Derivatives Clearing Rules (ie
the Options Clearing House's operating rules) because some relevant rules are
currently included in the Australian Stock Exchange's market operating rules;
• varying the CS facility licence of the Options
Clearing House so that it refers to 'derivatives', rather than 'futures
Back to Top
contracts'.
Further details of the first two dot points are provided below. The third dot
point does not require regulations.
Subsequent stages in the restructuring are proposed for 2003.
Changing the central counterparty for securities transactions - further
detail
Transactions on the ASX markets are novated and a central counterparty
interposed by virtue of the operating rules. The obligations of each broker are
then to that central counterparty. Thus, in the case of securities, the
facility will calculate the net amount each dealer owes with respect to the
particular day's transactions, and the net number of each company's securities
(eg BHP) traded that day which are due.
Currently, there are two central counterparties in the ASX clearing and
settlement arrangements:
• TNS Clearing Pty Limited is the central
counterparty with respect to transactions for which ASX Settlement and Transfer
Corporation Pty Limited provides services;
• the Options Clearing House is itself the central
counterparty for transactions for which it provides services.
One element of the first stage in restructuring the ASX's clearing and
settlement services will be to replace TNS Clearing Pty Limited with the
Options Clearing House as the central counterparty for securities
transactions.
Why consolidate the Derivatives Clearing Rules?
The Derivatives Clearing Rules need to be consolidated:
• to meet the terms of Part 7.3 of the
Corporations Act 2001 which will need to be complied with in full when
the conditions on the CS facility licence are amended as requested by the
Options Clearing House;
- this is the result of the transitional provisions
included in the Financial Services Reform Act 2001;
• to ensure compliance with the Trade Practices
Act 1974 (for example, the requirements for membership will be included in
the Options Clearing House's own rules, rather than in the operating rules of
the Australian Stock Exchange's main market (tied membership)).
2. EXPLANATION OF AMENDMENTS
As indicated above, the amendments to the Corporations Regulations relate only
to access to the National Guarantee Fund (Part 7.5) and indemnities arising in
the transfer of title to securities (Part 7.11).
The amendments to the regulations commence on 1 December 2002 (regulation 1),
the same date as the related changes to the business rules and conditions on
the Options Clearing House's licence.
Regulation 3 provides that Schedule 1 amends the Corporations Regulations
2001.
A description of the items in Schedule 1 follows.
Schedule l
A. Amendments relating to the National Guarantee
Fund
The National Guarantee Fund, which is administered by the Securities Exchanges
Guarantee Corporation Limited, provides both:
• clearing support for transactions in securities
(including options) on the Australian Stock Exchange;
• investor protection for clients of stockbrokers on
the Australian Stock Exchange.
The amendments under this heading fall into two groups:
• to recognise the consolidation of the Derivatives
Clearing Rules;
- with the omission of relevant rules from the
Australian Stock Exchange Business Rules including the rules for participation
in the Options Clearing House;
• recognising the change in central counterparty for
securities;
- from TNS Clearing Pty Limited to the Options
Clearing House.
Item [1] - subregulation 1.0.02(1) - definition of 'settlement
authority'
The term 'settlement authority' was defined in Corporations Regulation 1.0.02
to mean:
(a) a participating market licensee; or
(b) a prescribed CS facility.
This definition refers to only two bodies currently because:
• the only participating market licensee is the
Australian Stock Exchange Limited;
• ASX Settlement and Transfer Corporation Pty Limited
is currently the only prescribed CS facility.
- The primary purpose of prescription of licensed CS
facilities is access to Division 4 of Part 7.11 (which facilitates electronic
transfer of legal title).
Consolidation of the Derivatives Clearing Rules as operating rules of the
Options Clearing House will involve omitting the relevant option clearing rules
Back to Top
from the Australian Stock Exchange market operating rules and including them in
the Derivatives Clearing Rules (of the Options Clearing House).
In combination with the current definition of 'settlement authority' this will
have the effect that access to the National Guarantee Fund will be lost in
relation to the initial processing of option contracts unless the definition of
'settlement authority' is amended to encompass the Options Clearing House Pty
Limited.
The term is used in about 15 regulations in Part 7.5. One example is
Corporations Regulation 7.5.41, which relates to claims in respect of the
failure to transfer a net number of securities in respect of transactions. It
refers to the rules of the 'settlement authority'.
In order to encompass the restructured operations and maintain the National
Guarantee Fund's current coverage, 'the licensed CS facility operated by
Options Clearing House Pty Limited' is added to the definition of 'settlement
authority'.
Items [2], [3], [22], [23], [38], [39] - Omission of transfer delivery
service provisions
The transfer delivery service of the Australian Stock Exchange, which is
referred to in Subdivision 4.6 of Part 7.5 of the Corporations Regulations, is
now obsolete.
The following have therefore been deleted:
• in Corporations Regulation 1.0.02: the definitions
of 'TDS nominee' and 'transfer delivery service provisions';
• in Corporations Regulation 7.5.01, the definition
of 'clearing nominee';
• Corporations Regulations 7.5.32, 7.5.39, 7.5.47 and
Subdivision 4.6.
Item [4] - Regulation 7.5.01 - definition of obligations
The previous definition of 'obligations' in Corporations Regulation 7.5.01 was
drafted on the assumption that participants in the Options Clearing House are
also participants in the Australian Stock Exchange main market, and that the
relevant rules are included in the business rules of the Australian Stock
Exchange's main market.
This definition has therefore been amended:
• so that it is not limited to 'a participant of a
participating market licensee' but extends to participants of the Options
Clearing House (because the rules for participation in the Options Clearing
House will be moved into the Derivatives Clearing Rules); and
• to encompass obligations arising under the Options
Clearing House operating rules as well as obligations arising under the
operating rules of ASX Settlement and Transfer Pty Limited.
Item [5]-Regulation 7.5.01 - definition of 'reportable transaction'
In brief, Corporations Regulation 7.5.01 previously defined 'reportable
transaction' as a sale or purchase of securities by a participant of a
participating market licensee which is required by the operating rules of the
market licensee to be reported.
The concept of a 'reportable transaction' is used in a number of regulations in
Part 7.5, particularly those relating to claiming on the 'contract guarantee'.
It brings in transactions which are off-market but which must be reported, in
accordance with the operating rules. It thus encompasses 'crossings' in
brokers' offices.
The definition worked satisfactorily in the case of the exercise of option
contracts because:
• the rules requiring the reporting of the exercise
of option contracts are included in the Australian Stock Exchange market
operating rules; and
• all participants in the Options Clearing House are
participants of the Australian Stock Exchange.
However, as indicated above:
• there will be separate membership of the Options
Clearing House following the first stage of the re-structuring; and
• the rules relating to the exercise of options are
being removed from the Australian Stock Exchange operating rules and included
in the Derivative Clearing Rules (ie the operating rules of the Options
Clearing House).
To maintain the current level of protection provided by the National Guarantee
Fund, the definition was amended so that it encompasses the exercise of an
option contract over securities where:
• the option contract was entered into on the
financial market of a participating market licensee; and
• the exercise of the contract is required to be
reported to the participating market licensee by the operating rules of the
Options Clearing House Pty Limited.
The concept is not relevant to the initial entering into the option contract.
Item [6] - [9] - Corporations Regulation 7.5.03 - Definition of
'dealer'
The term 'dealer' was defined in Corporations Regulation 7.5.03 for two
separate purposes:
• for Subdivision 4.5 (ie claims in respect of net
obligations) (subregulation 7.5.03(2)), the term was defined to mean:
Back to Top
(a) a participating market licensee; or
(b) a participant of a participating market licensee.
• for other purposes, it was defined to mean a person
who is, or has been at any time, a participant of a participating market
licensee (subregulation 7.5.03(1)).
Once the criteria for becoming a participant in the Options Clearing House are
moved into the Derivatives Clearing Rules, then a participant in the Options
Clearing House Pty Limited will not necessarily be a participant in the
Australian Stock Exchange market.
For these reasons:
• subregulation 7.5.03(2) has been amended to refer
in addition to a 'participant of the licensed CS facility operated by Options
Clearing House Pty Limited';
• a further specific definition of 'dealer' has been
included in 7.5.03(3) for the purpose of Subdivision 4.9 (of Part 7.5);
- in this case the term 'dealer' encompasses
participants of a participating market licensee and participants of the
licensed CS facility operated by the Options Clearing House;
- (Subdivision 4.9 relates to the situation where
property is entrusted and the dealer becomes insolvent.)
• consequential amendments have been made to
subregulations 7.5.03(1) and (2).
The term 'dealer' is used in about 30 regulations under Part 7.5. An example is
7.5.67 which provides that there is no claim against the National Guarantee
Fund for money lent to a dealer.
Item [10] - [13] -Corporations Regulation 7.5.04 - excluded person
Corporations Regulation 7.5.04 previously defined the term 'excluded person'
which is used in four subsequent regulations.
The purpose of these provisions is to ensure that the participant (the broker),
relatives and bodies controlled by them cannot claim from the National
Guarantee Fund in the event of, for example, the participant's insolvency.
Corporations Regulation 7.5.04 has been amended so that, in the case of a claim
under Subdivision 4.9 in relation to a participant of the licensed CS facility
operated by the Options Clearing House, a comparable set of people are
excluded. The amendment was needed because a participant in the Options
Clearing House will no longer necessarily be a participant of the participating
market licensee.
Item [14] - Corporations Regulation 7.5.06 - Meaning of sale and purchase of
securities
Corporations Regulation 7.5.06 is another interpretive provision. It provides
the meaning of 'sale and purchase of securities' which is used in about 7 other
regulations.
For the sake of clarity, Corporations Regulation 7.5.06 has been amended so
that the exercise of an option contract over securities is, in certain
specified circumstances, taken to be a sale and purchase of securities.
Items [15] - [17] - Corporations Regulations 7.5.07 and 7.5.08 - Meaning of
securities business
Corporations Regulations 7.5.07 and 7.5.08 provided two meanings of the term
'securities business', for separate purposes.
Corporations Regulation 7.5.08 has been amended so that the definition of
'securities business' in that regulation applies in relation to Subdivision
4.5, as well as Subdivision 4.9. This definition is considered more appropriate
because it refers to option contracts.
(Subdivision 4.5 refers to claims in respect of net obligations and Subdivision
4.9 refers to claims in respect of insolvent participants.)
A consequential amendment has been made to Corporations Regulation 7.5.07.
The opportunity has been taken to update Corporations Regulation 7.5.07(4) so
that it refers to the new Australian financial services licensees (and those
exempt from holding such a licence) as well as dealers who have not
transitioned into the new regime.
Items [18] - [19] - Corporations Regulation 7.5.12 - Attributing securities
and payments to transactions
Corporations Regulation 7.5.12 provides backing for the operating rules in
certain circumstances where it is otherwise impossible to tell the number of
securities transferred to a participating market licensee or a participant of a
participating market licensee.
The previous drafting assumed that the operating rules of the participating
market licensee determine this and that the participants are of a participating
market licensee.
In the light of the consolidation of the Derivatives Clearing Rules and the
cessation of tied membership, this regulation has been amended to include a
reference to the operating rules of the Options Clearing House and to encompass
references to the Options Clearing House and its participants.
Items [20] - [21] - Corporations Regulation 7.5.19 - Third party clearing
arrangements
Third party clearing involves:
• one broker (the transacting member) acting on
behalf of the client in entering into the transaction;
• another broker (the clearing participant) having
the obligation to complete the transaction.
Back to Top
It is recognised in relation to two heads of claim against the National
Guarantee Fund:
• Subdivision 4.3 (contract guarantee); and
• Subdivision 4.9 (insolvency).
In each case, the previous Corporations Regulation 7.5.19 includes an
assumption that it will be the Australian Stock Exchange market operating rules
which impose the obligation on the clearing participant.
This will no longer work after the first stage of the restructuring process
when:
• in the case of option contracts, the relevant rules
are omitted from the Australian Stock Exchange market operating rules and
included instead in the Derivatives Clearing Rules (ie the operating rules of
the Options Clearing House);
• clearing participants will no longer necessarily be
participants of the Australian Stock Exchange market.
This regulation has therefore been amended to allow for the possibility that:
• the participant may be a participant of the Options
Clearing House or the Australian Stock Exchange; and
• that the relevant operating rules may be those of
the Options Clearing House or the Australian Stock Exchange.
In addition, the cross reference in Corporations Regulation 7.5.19(2) has been
corrected.
Items [24], [26], [28], [29], [31] - [37] - Corporations Regulations 7.5.40,
41 and 45 - 'Subsidiary of a settlement authority'
Corporations Regulations 7.5.40, 41 and 45 relate to claims in respect of net
obligations. An example is a claim in respect of the failure to pay a net
amount in respect of transactions.
They operated on the assumption that the central counter-party is the
subsidiary of the 'settlement authority' and it is the settlement authority
that has set the operating rules that determine the amounts due.
This worked appropriately while:
• the settlement authority rules which determined the
amounts due in the case of securities (other than the initial processing
of option contracts) were the rules of ASX Settlement and Transfer Corporation
Pty Limited and the central counter-party was its subsidiary, TNS Clearing Pty
Limited;
• the settlement authority rules which determined the
amounts due when option contracts are entered into were the Australian
Stock Exchange operating rules, and the central counter-party was its
subsidiary, the Options Clearing House Pty Limited.
However, references to 'subsidiary of the settlement authority' and subsequent
references to 'the subsidiary' will not work after the proposed changes in
stage 1 of the restructuring:
• in the case of securities (other than option
contracts) when the Options Clearing House Pty Limited takes over the central
counter-party role for transactions in securities entered into on the main
market of the Australian Stock Exchange, the references will not work because
of the corporate structure of the ASX Group:
- Options Clearing House Pty Limited, although a
subsidiary of Australian Stock Exchange Limited, is not a subsidiary of ASX
Settlement and Transfer Corporation Pty Limited (which, under the new
arrangements, will be the settlement authority).
• in the case of the initial processing of option
contracts, the rules which determine the amounts due will be moved from the
Australian Stock Exchange operating rules into Derivatives Clearing Rules (ie
the operating rules of the Options Clearing House), and the Options Clearing
House Pty Limited will be the central counter-party for this purpose.
- the central counterparty is the same entity as the
settlement authority.
The references to subsidiary of a settlement authority (and subsequent
references to 'the subsidiary' and 'its subsidiary') (in 7.5.40 and 41) and
'its subsidiary' (in 7.5.45) have therefore been amended to encompass the
Options Clearing House Pty Limited. This is achieved through the use of the
term 'central counterparty' and defining that term.
Item [25], [27], [31] - Corporations Regulations 7.5.40 - which transactions
are covered?
Previously Corporations Regulation 7.5.40 indirectly limited to transactions in
securities and option contracts because of the types of transactions in
relation to which the relevant bodies provide services.
Following the restructuring, this is not clear because the Options Clearing
House also provides services in relation to futures contracts.
In order to ensure that the status quo is retained, the amendment defines the
word 'transaction' used in that regulation so that the outer limit is the
concept of 'securities' in subsection 92(1) of the old Corporations Act. Within
that limit, the kind or kinds of transactions covered are to be specified by
the operating rules.
Item [30] - Corporations Regulation 7.5.40 - reference to 'participating
market licensee'
Previously subregulation 7.5.40(2) provided that an entitlement to make a claim
under Regulation 7.5.40 is not affected by a dealer ceasing to be a participant
of a participating market licensee after the obligation arose. It therefore
provides 'run-off cover'.
This subregulation has been amended so that it is clear that entitlement is not
affected by the dealer ceasing to be a participant in the Options Clearing
House
This is necessary because, following the first stage of the restructuring, a
dealer may be a member of the Options Clearing House but not the Australian
Stock Exchange's main market.
Item [40] - Corporations Regulation 7.5.64 - Claim in respect of
property entrusted to, or received by, dealer before dealer became
insolvent
Item [41] - Corporations Regulation 7.5.65 - Cash settlement of claims
if property unobtainable
Corporations Regulations 7.5.64 and 7.5.65 relate to claims in respect of
insolvent participants.
Both refer to the operating rules of a participating market licensee.
Following stage 1 of the restructuring outlined above, the relevant rules will
be included in the consolidated Derivatives Clearing Rules.
These regulations have therefore been amended to include references to the
operating rules of the Options Clearing House.
Item [42] - Corporations Regulation 7.5.68(a) - Nexus with Australia
Corporations Regulation 7.5.68 dictates the nexus with Australia that the
dealer must have had for a claim under Subdivision 4.9 to be entertained. This
Subdivision relates to claims in respect of insolvent participants.
The previous drafting assumes that the dealer was a participant of a
participating market licensee at the time of the insolvency.
This regulation has been amended so that the dealer must have been, at that
time:
• a participant of a participating market licensee;
or
• a participant in the Options Clearing House;
whichever is appropriate to the particular transaction.
Once again, this amendment is needed because there will no longer be 'tied
membership'.
Item [43] - [44] - Corporations Regulation 7.5.81-Arbitration of amount of
cash settlement of certain claims
This regulation has been amended so that if the claim relates to a participant
in the Options Clearing House in that capacity, the Options Clearing House
makes the appointment of the arbitrators. In addition, the persons appointed
may not be connected with the Options Clearing House.
B. Transfer of title
Items [45] - [47] - Corporations Regulations 7.11.30(2)(f), 31(2)(e) and
32(2)(f) - Indemnities in respect of warranted matters
Corporations Regulations 7.11.30, 7.11.31 and 7.11.32 all relate to indemnities
given in the process of transfers effected through a prescribed CS facility.
The provisions fall within Division 4 of Part 7.11, which facilitates the
electronic transfer of legal title to securities.
An example of what the indemnities cover is the following situation (taken from
Corporations Regulation 7.11.31):
• a participant is taken to have warranted that the
transferor was legally entitled to transfer the relevant securities;
- and this was incorrect;
• the participant is liable to indemnify, among
others, the issuer, the transferee and TNS Clearing Pty Limited against any
loss arising from this.
Previously, Corporations Regulations 7.11.30(2)(f), 31(2)(e) and 32(2)(f)
referred explicitly to TNS Clearing Pty Limited.
The intention in these regulations is to refer to the central counter-party for
securities transactions.
As indicated above, these references are inappropriate when TNS Clearing Pty
Limited ceases to perform this role and it is performed instead by Options
Clearing House Pty Limited.
These references have therefore been amended so that they refer to both TNS
Clearing Pty Limited and the Options Clearing House Pty Limited, when
performing the role of central counter-party for securities. Both central
counterparties need to be included because of the delay between execution and
settlement - there will thus be a period of days when there will be outstanding
transactions, some of which are novated to TNS Clearing Pty Limited and others
novated to the Options Clearing House.