Corporations Amendment Regulations 2004 (No. 2) 2004 No. 25
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Statutory Rules 2004 No. 25
Issued by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer
Corporations Act 2001
Corporations Amendment Regulations 2004 (No. 2)
Subection 1364(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act) provides that
the Governor-General may make regulations prescribing matters required or
permitted by the Act to be prescribed by regulations or necessary or convenient
to be prescribed by such regulations for carrying out or giving effect to the
Act.
The Financial Services Reform Act 2001 (FSRA) commenced on 11 March
2002. It amended the Act to introduce a uniform licensing, conduct and
disclosure regime for financial service providers. Under the FSRA, a two-year
transition period was established to allow time for existing industry
participants to enter the new regime.
The purpose of the Regulations is to support the reforms to the regulation of
the financial services industry which were implemented in the FSRA and
associated legislation. The Regulations facilitate transition to the new
licensing, conduct and disclosure arrangements and promote certainty,
clarifying, where necessary, various provisions under the FSRA.
The Regulations include amendments that:
• improve the operation of the disclosure regime;
• specify a number of things that are not financial
products; and
• provide conditional exemptions from the FSRA
licensing regime. Details of the Regulations are set out in the
Attachment.
Regulations 1 to 3 and Schedule 1 commence on gazettal.
ATTACHMENT
DETAILS OF THE CORPORATIONS AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2004 (NO. 2)
Regulation 1 provides that the name of the Regulations is the Corporations
Amendment Regulations 2004 (No. 2).
Regulation 2 provides that regulations 1 to 3 and Schedule 1 commence on
gazettal.
Regulation 3 provides that Schedule 1 of the Regulations amend the
Corporations Regulations 2001 (the Principal Regulations).
Schedule 1 - amendments commencing on gazettal
Item 1 Meaning of class of financial services -
regulation 7.1.04E.
Division 6 of Part 7.6 of the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act) deals with
the liability of licensees for the conduct of their representatives. A key
aspect of whether a licensee is responsible for the conduct of a representative
turns on the meaning of the expression "class of financial service".
The meaning of "class of financial service" is not certain, particularly where
a representative may act on behalf of more than one licensee. In relation to
insurance, for example, a representative might represent one licensee (licensee
A) in respect of life insurance products, and another licensee (licensee B) in
respect of general insurance products.
The term "class of financial service" could be given a broad interpretation -
for example, providing advice on, or dealing in, a financial product. Using the
above example, if such an interpretation is adopted, both licensee A and
licensee B may be potentially liable for all of the conduct of the
representative, even though the representative is only authorised to act on
their behalf in relation to life and general insurance products respectively.
This wide interpretation may be leading to a reluctance on the part of
licensees to 'cross-endorse' representatives (a representative that wishes to
represent more than one licensee must obtain the consent of all of the
licensees - section 916C).
Regulation 7.1.04E identifies, for the purposes of subsections 917A(3), 917C(2)
and 917C(3), each of the following as a class of financial service:
• the provision of financial product advice relating
to a general insurance product;
• the provision of financial product advice relating
to an investment life insurance product;
• the provision of financial product advice relating
to a life risk insurance product;
• dealing in a financial product that is a general
insurance product;
• dealing in a financial product that is an
investment life insurance product; and
• dealing in a financial product that is a life risk
insurance product.
General insurance product, investment life insurance product, and
life risk insurance product are all defined in section 761A of the Act. The
regulation would not diminish the consumer protection provided by the liability
provisions. The list is not intended to be exhaustive, but would assist in
identifying the activities of representatives for which licensees are
responsible and consequently make cross-endorsement more attractive.
Item 2 Specific things that are not financial
Back to Top
products: Australian Capital Territory Insurance - regulation 7.1.07H.
The regulation results in insurance provided by the Australian Capital
Territory being treated in the same manner as that of other States and
Territories.
Paragraph 765A(1)(e) of the Act provides that State insurance and Northern
Territory insurance are not financial products for the purposes of the FSR Act.
However, there is no reference to Australian Capital Territory insurance as
paragraph 765A(1)(e) reflects subsection 9(2) of the Insurance Contracts Act
1984 (ICA) and the Australian Capital Territory was not self-governing at
the time the ICA was enacted.
Paragraph 765A(1)(y) of the Act provides that a facility, interest or other
thing declared by regulations made for the purpose of subsection 765A(1) is not
a financial product. The regulation excludes Australian Capital Territory
insurance from the definition of a financial product along similar lines to
other States and Territories as provided for in paragraph 765A(1)(e).
Item 3 Risk advice - amendment to regulation
7.1.29.
Regulation 7.1.29 of the Principal Regulations sets out circumstances in which
a person is taken not to provide a financial service, in effect, conduct which
is exempt from the new regime.
The amendments to the regulation would extend the scope of the relief it
provides to allow generic risk management advice that is not restricted merely
to business clients. This allows other clients, such as private individuals, to
receive basic advice that they should make risk mitigation arrangements, such
as to take out insurance. The relief would be restricted to the presence of a
risk that a person may face and does not allow the recommendation of specific
advice about financial products, for example, those provided by a particular
issuer.
Item 4 Accountants and self-managed superannuation
funds - new regulation 7.1.29A
Paragraph 7.1.29(5)(c)(ii) of the Principal Regulations indicates that a person
provides an exempt service if advice is given in relation to a superannuation
product and that advice does not include a recommendation to acquire or dispose
of that product.
The purpose of the amendment is to provide an exemption from the FSRA for
recognised accountants making a recommendation that a person acquire or dispose
of a self-managed superannuation product.
The amendment only applies in relation to self-managed superannuation as
opposed to other superannuation products. Self-managed superannuation funds are
often used as a tool to implement FSRA-exempted advice given by accountants,
such as business structuring advice and taxation advice. The exemption for
self-managed superannuation would therefore be in keeping with the policy of
exempting such advice from the FSRA. Further, the exemption would be limited to
the following members of professional bodies, which are subject to continuing
educational and ethical requirements:
• members of CPA Australia who are entitled to use
the post-nominals "CPA" or "FCPA", and are subject to and comply with CPA
Australia's continuing professional education requirements;
• members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants
in Australia (ICAA) who are entitled to use the post-nominals "CA", "ACA" or
"FCA", and are subject to and comply with ICAA's continuing professional
education requirements; and
• members of the National Institute of Accountants
(NIA) who are entitled to use the post-nominals "PNA", "FPNA", "MNIA" or
"FNIA", and are subject to and comply with the NIA's continuing professional
education requirements.
Item 5 Licensing of overseas derivative
counterparties - regulation 7.6.01(1)(ma).
An International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) master agreement can
be used to establish a framework for future derivative trading between two
parties, by setting out the terms and conditions for those future
transactions.
Due to the combined application of subsection 911D(1), subsection 761E(5), and
section 766C, an overseas entity that is a party to an ISDA derivative contract
may be required to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence.
Subsection 761E(5) deems each person who is a party to a derivative, which is
not entered into or acquired on a financial market, to be an issuer of the
product. Section 766C states that issuing a financial product constitutes
'dealing' for the purposes of the FSRA licensing regime.
If the overseas entity deals in derivatives (due to subsection 761E(5) and
section 766C) to an Australian client under an ISDA agreement, subsection
911D(1) works to ensure that the overseas entity is considered to be conducting
a business 'in this jurisdiction' and hence requires a license to enter that
trade.
The regulation exempts an overseas entity from the requirement to hold a
licence, where the following conditions were met:
• derivatives are traded under a contract which sets
out the terms and conditions for future derivative trading between two parties
(the agreement);
• the first party is not in this jurisdiction
Back to Top
(overseas counterparty);
• the second party to the contract is an Australian
wholesale client (Australian counterparty);
• the agreement was initiated/established by the
Australian counterparty;
• the Australian counterparty holds an Australian
Financial Services Licence which permits it to make a market or deal in the
financial product to which the agreement relates; and
• both the overseas counterparty and the Australian
counterparty are dealing on their own behalf, in the financial product that is
the subject of the agreement.
This regulation only exempts dealings occurring through a formal arrangement.
The exemption is not intended to extend to ad hoc transactions, which could be
seen as creating a greater risk to market integrity.
Item 6 Notification of authorised representatives:
basic deposit products - regulation 7.6.04B.
Part 7.6 of the Act deals with licensing of providers of financial services.
Paragraph 926B(1)(c), in Part 7.6, provides that the regulations may provide
that this Part applies as if specified provisions were omitted, modified or
varied as specified in the regulations.
This item would insert regulation 7.6.04B, which is made under paragraph
926B(1)(c) of the Act. The effect of the regulation is to modify paragraph
916F(1AA)(d), which relates to the notification to the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission (ASIC) of the appointment of certain authorised
representatives. Paragraph 916F(1AA)(d) currently provides that notification to
ASIC of the appointment of representatives is not required where those
representatives only provide general advice on, or deal in, financial products
specified in the regulations.
Regulation 7.6.04B modifies paragraph 916F(1AA)(d) to add a subparagraph (iii),
the effect of which is that the appointment of an authorised representative who
gives personal advice about a basic deposit product or a facility for making
non-cash payments that relate to a basic deposit product, would not have to be
notified to ASIC (provided that the requirements of paragraphs 916F(1 AA)(a) to
(c) are also met).
Items 7, 11 to 15 Meaning of able to be traded -
amended regulations 7.7.02, 7.8.17, 7.8.20, 7.8.21 & 7.9.63B.
The expression "able to be traded", in relation to products on a financial
market, is used in a number of provisions in Chapter 7 of the Act. The
expression is defined in section 761A, and may include all types of financial
products that a licensed market is authorised to trade. The definition is
necessarily quite broad. However, in some cases the breadth of that expression
may impose significant regulatory obligations that will be difficult to comply
with, particularly where an Australian Financial Services Licence holder is not
in a position to participate in the licensed market on which the relevant
financial product is able to be traded.
Australian market licences are issued in broad terms, so that a licensed market
is authorised to trade a wide range of financial products, such as derivatives
or securities. This means that all types of derivatives or securities may be
"able to be traded" on a financial market that is licensed.
The regulations in these items limit the expression "able to be traded" in
various provisions -- namely, subsection 941 C(8) (item 7), subsection 991 B(2)
(items 11 and 12), paragraphs 991 E(1)(c) and (d) (item 13), subsection 991F(3)
(item 14) and paragraphs 7.9.63B(6)(a) and (b) of the Corporations Regulations
(item 16).
The breadth of the expression "able to be traded" means that a licensee may not
know whether a particular financial product is able to be traded on a financial
market on which the licensee is not a participant or does not have access
through a third party. The regulations are aimed at limiting the application of
the obligation to trading on licensed markets where a licensee may trade either
directly or indirectly. This would overcome the difficulties associated with
the breadth of the definition of "able to be traded" in relation to licensees
that are not participants on the relevant licensed market referred in these
specific provisions, but would not affect the definition in other, contexts.
For example, amended regulation 7.7.02(5B) clarifies that for subsection
941C(8), a Financial Services Guide does not have to be given in certain
circumstances where it may not be possible for a person to ascertain if a
financial product is able to be traded on a financial market in which the
person is not a participant. The Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) obligation
would continue to apply (as applicable).
Item 8 Identity of authorised representatives in a
Financial Services Guide - amended regulation 7.7.05B.
This regulation removes the need to disclose the identity of an individual or
corporate authorised representative in a Financial Services Guide (FSG) where
their identity or remuneration is not material in the decision to acquire a
financial service.
The amendments extend the relief from FSG content requirements provided only to
individuals by the existing regulation 7.7.05B. The amendments allow generic
references (as opposed to each by name) in the FSG to both individual and
corporate authorised representatives. This will facilitate more streamlined
FSGs for licensees. The relief recognises that when the identity or
remuneration of the authorised representative is not useful in making a
decision about acquiring a financial service, its provision is unnecessary and
will not be required. An example is a salaried worker in a call centre whose
salary is not sales-linked and their identity is not useful information for the
customer. In contrast, the identity of an authorised representative who
receives a sales based commission should be disclosed in the FSG as this
information could be relevant to the client's decision to acquire a financial
product.
The exclusion from the content of a FSG would only apply to the identity of the
authorised representative. Other content requirements would still have to be
met, such as remuneration. It is not expected that the remuneration of an
individual or corporate authorised representative where the identity or
remuneration is immaterial would have to be disclosed beyond general terms.
This is consistent with the disclosure required for an employee of a
licensee.
The regulation is also limited to the financial services of dealing and general
advice. This is because in these instances, the identity of the authorised
representative is not likely to have a material impact on the decision to
acquire the financial service. In contrast, for other financial services, such
as the provision of personal advice, it is more likely that the identity of the
authorised representative will be a material consideration for a retail
client.
The amendments to subregulation 7.7.05B(1) ensure access to this relief can be
used by corporate licensees and authorised representatives who authorise a
person to deliver a service on behalf of a licensee.
Exemption from providing certain information in a Financial Services Guide -
regulation 7.7.05C.
This amendment ensures that an FSG is not required to disclose information
about a basic deposit product or non-cash payment facility, given these
financial products do not require a FSG to be provided in the first place.
Under subsection 941C(6), a FSG is not required for a financial service
provided in relation to a basic deposit product or non-cash payment facility.
However, where the providing entity conducts a financial service in relation to
another financial product that does require a FSG, it must contain information
about all 'authorised services', which would mean that details about the
financial products under subsection 941C(6) would have to be given, even though
there is a general FSG exemption for these products.
The amendment allows a providing entity to exclude certain information from its
FSG. The relief is limited to information about authorised services and
remuneration that applies to a financial service covered by subsection 941
C(6). This ensures that the relief is limited to the financial services
directly and exclusively reflected in subsection 941C(6).
Items 9 and 10 Australian Financial Services
Licence (AFSL) number and authorised representative numbers - regulations
7.7.06A and 7.7.11A.
The FSG and Statement of Advice (SoA) given by an authorised representative
must identify the authorising licensee. These regulations make it clear that an
authorised representative's FSG and SoA must include the authorising licensee's
AFSL number.